this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
95 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30419 readers
293 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
remington@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
Whom@beehaw.org
The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org
chloyster@beehaw.org
95
We played Valve’s secret new shooter: Deadlock (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 month ago by ayla@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It’s like Overwatch, Dota 2, and Team Fortress 2 all baked into a pie.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

And I’m not under NDA. I have signed no contracts, made no verbal agreements; I haven’t even clicked through a EULA.  This message does pop up when I launch Deadlock, but I didn’t click OK; instead, I hit the Escape key and watched it disappear.

I’m not a lawyer but I sure hope the writer of this checked with a lawyer before posting because that does not sound right.

Edit: Thank you Vodulas for pointing out this update appended to the article.

Update, August 12th: Turns out Valve was not fine with me trying Deadlock with friends; I’ve been banned from matchmaking! Oh well. Please feel free to make fun of me in the comments!

[–] Virkkunen@fedia.io 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is no NDA to sign or anything though, only this pop up warning. Valve can't sue you for sharing details of the game but they absolutely can remove you from the play testing and/or ban you from ever playing it again for this.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 19 points 1 month ago

Which they did. There is an update at the end of the article. Just a thoughtless move by that author

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Usually the first line in these agreements is "by using this software you agree..." And not "by pressing okay you agree..."

Though I also am not sure how that itself would hold up in court.

[–] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't we reach a point where EULAs are non-enforcable? Or is that just in the EU? But regardless, Valve can just ban you and good luck doing anything about it.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 17 points 1 month ago

Certain clauses may be unenforceable, but not the entire EULA.

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ll have to see if I’ve got a copy of an NDA I signed for play testing but that’s what I would have thought. It would be provisional on your participation not on an agreement like old school EULAs. As someone else pointed out it seems to be in closed beta or some form of early access, so maybe Valve won’t care and it won’t come back on them.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 month ago

At best they ignore it. At worst, they never invite the user to test anything again. I doubt they'd issue an account ban for that. Not even sure if they can straight up ban you from the platform anyway and lock you out of your games entirely; pretty sure the bans are limited to VAC secured servers for online play and the array of community features like posting on the forums.

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 19 points 1 month ago

Lawyers hate this one simple trick

[–] powerofm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Looks like anyone who has access can invite their steam friends, so I guess it's like closed beta? Seems weird to have something soft-launch with zero announcements. The design also looks very rudimentary. Im

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’m-

RIP. Taken out by Valve legal team already, everyone bail.

[–] Virkkunen@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago

It's a closed alpha test claiming everything is placeholder content and could/will change while they flesh out the design, hence why they don't want you to share anything.

[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A new shooter from valve? Hell yeah!!

a hero shooter

Oh. Never mind then.

[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I absolutely get where you're coming from, but to be fair Team Fortress is basically a hero shooter as well, except that there can be multiples of the same "hero" on the battlefield at the same time. Or - and I'm genuinely asking because I haven't played "hero shooters" in that long - am I missing a core distinction of hero shooters?

[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 15 points 1 month ago

I was thinking something more in line with a narrative story-based shooter like half life. TF2 and other competitive shooter arena games were never really my thing.

[–] asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love valve (as much as I can love any company anyway) and I'd like to try deadlock at some point if given the opportunity, but hero shooters are not for everyone, give me a single player story any day

[–] loops@beehaw.org 4 points 4 weeks ago

*cries in Half Life 3

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So a class shooter?

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

Same thing, innit, the only difference is the plot

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

TF2 is a class based team deathmatch FPS. One class, one character.

In hero shooters you have multiple characters with different abilities that make them distinct from each other, yet all can conform to a certain class type and role.

[–] homicidalrobot@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

Someone has never played a round of highlander.

[–] irasponsible@beehaw.org 7 points 4 weeks ago

It's barely a hero shooter - it's just a MOBA

[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Anyone else feel disappointed it's just another MOBA? Like, this is territory Smite has been treading for years.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Mobas are not my thing. Thought this might be cool, but it's literally just an over the shoulder moba. Honestly, it didn't feel fresh at all.

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 3 points 1 month ago

this is territory Smite has been treading for years.

And Paragon/Predecessor

[–] captain_oni@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Specially since apparently it has some of the most toxic mechanics I hate from MOBAS (last hit, creep denial) and another that I just hate (itemization ) after playing MOBAS that did away with it, and actually felt much more fun to play (Dawngate and Heroes of the Storm).

[–] jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

The gameplay is braindead just like most mobas and is not anything like TF2. Its smite with guns.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 7 points 4 weeks ago

I got in today, got to play a few matches. It was pretty fun, I'm not huge on MOBA's but I'm not entirely against them. I liked games like Sanctum and Sanctum 2 (this isn't really like those, since those are tower defenses) but it's got the same vibe going. Turning a familiar genre and adapting it into a different perspective. The characters I've played have been interesting, I haven't loved them all but it seems like a decently well rounded cast. There's some really good gameplay moments in there though with some of the character abilities. Playing slow and methodically has been working out well for me.

Interested to see what will change. It's a bit chaotic right now, in some good ways and in some difficult to see ways. I have noticed a couple of the same characters in every game, can't tell if it's out of interest or if people knowing they are very strong. I like it though so far, it's pretty easy to get the opponent tilted if in a single lane. Steal their soul points, push them with damage just enough to annoy them, punish when they start making mistakes

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How not battle royal.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Valve do what they want, not what's flavour-of-the-month

[–] HER0@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

Well, sometimes they do flavour-of-the-month, but only when they want to, not because they exclusively chase trends.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the one hand, not a big fan of moba or purely PVP games.

On the other, I deeply dislike overwatch specifically and would like to see it dead. Maybe this would make a dent.

[–] Manapany@jlai.lu 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I never understood this attitude of wanting soooo bad a game to be dead. If you don't like it don't play it. Let other ppl have their fun.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 month ago

Sometimes you feel like the shittier game took players from the game you'd rather be playing.

Sometimes you feel like the shittier game is kind of a knockoff, and it feels bad when that succeeds.

Sometimes a game is made by a horrible company with a history of abuse from its high ranking staff.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe Overwatch beat them up and stole their lunch money.

[–] VulKendov@reddthat.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

Overwatch basically killed Battleborn when it launched, it'd be kinda ironic if Overwatch was killed by another MOBA shooter.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 7 points 4 weeks ago

Their definition of “secret” seems very different from mine.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

Someone's about to lose their preferential access

[–] gloombert@beehaw.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

i was kind of hoping it would be less generic but im sure some people will still like it once its out :D