Astronomy

4056 readers

55 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

475

Size Comparison: Pluto and Australia (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 3 months ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/astronomy@mander.xyz

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source

(page 2) 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can see why they no longer call it a planet, what's the cutoff for asteroid size?

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

It is still a dwarf planet. Basically when it hits hydrostatic equilibrium, i.e. when it's round, it is considered a dwarf planet. More here

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In future news; Donald X Musk III, worlds first quintillionare, decided to alter Pluto's orbit to collide with Mars "Becauth it would be thoo cool!".

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

That's awesome. And to think, it's only slightly less inhospitable in Australia!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

The Alice Springs Pluto Observatory has opened considerably under-budget.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm digging the way the map shows Tasmania as part of the continental plate.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is it on purpose or is it because of ocean depth?

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The light blue part is shallow and when it's underwater, they call it "continental shelf".
Tasmania and mainland Australia are connected by the same, shared continental shelf.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

TIL australia has hydrostatic equilibrium.

[–] Numenor@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Do it.

load more comments