this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38531 readers
1867 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Swiss food firm’s infant formula and cereal sold in global south ignore WHO anti-obesity guidelines for Europe, says Public Eye

Nestlé, the world’s largest consumer goods company, adds sugar and honey to infant milk and cereal products sold in many poorer countries, contrary to international guidelines aimed at preventing obesity and chronic diseases, a report has found.

Campaigners from Public Eye, a Swiss investigative organisation, sent samples of the Swiss multinational’s baby-food products sold in Asia, Africa and Latin America to a Belgian laboratory for testing.

The results, and examination of product packaging, revealed added sugar in the form of sucrose or honey in samples of Nido, a follow-up milk formula brand intended for use for infants aged one and above, and Cerelac, a cereal aimed at children aged between six months and two years.

In Nestlé’s main European markets, including the UK, there is no added sugar in formulas for young children. While some cereals aimed at older toddlers contain added sugar, there is none in products targeted at babies between six months and one year.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nestle is a notorious scumbag company, personally I have avoided anything Nestle all my life, since when I grew up, there were already news about illegally bad quality/harmful formula food. I have NEVER heard a good thing about that company.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s surprisingly hard to do. Nestlé produces 35% of the products in a North American grocery store.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I felt so betrayed the other day when I looked at my San Pellegrino and saw it was a Nestlé company.

[–] Dohnuthut@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

As of now, the only product I have to buy to support this atrocious company is Fancy Feast because it's the only food my picky senior cat will eat.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

I was so happy I could get my cat off of Purina.

[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Ugh their firm grip on the pet food market endlessly pisses me off. I paid for a fancy B Corp certified cat food brand for years before realising it had been bought out by Nestlé

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

~~You're feeding your cat the equivalent of potato chips. No shit it's all they want to eat lol~~

Edit: I can't read. See below

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

At least they're hydrating potato chips. Kidney failure is a big problem for cats, sticking to an all-wet diet is already better than average.

[–] coolteathatisgreen@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe they are trying to cut cost to able to sell cheap in poor country

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

they also tell doctors in these poor countries to give the stupid products to new mothers with perfectly normal milk production. they tell them it's better than natural milk. It's an American product, and they buy into it because they want their kid to be smart like an American. Nestle is an awful company.

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 0 points 5 months ago

Smart like an American?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Maybe I missed it in the article, but isn't it more expensive for Nestlé to add the sugar than to not use it? I don't understand their motivation here. I mean, I assume it's evil considering what company this is, I just don't understand it.

[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago

Sugar is psychologically addictive

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Their motivation might be to get the kids hooked on the stuff early on. Sugar works like a drug in some ways by releasing dopamine in the brain and if you train your brain early on it will affect it longterm. Plus it will influence their future taste preferences. Everything else, besides Nestle's oversugared snacks will taste bland in comparison. Leading to kids crying at supermarket checkouts to get their favourite snacks :D

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some brain and a bunch of gut biome I suspect.

Once the sugar eating biome get established they rule the roost.

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Also social factors come to play, like influencing purchasing behavior, cooking, food at restaurants etc