this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
6 points (56.8% liked)

News

22839 readers
3641 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

tldr: he's against their government-led human rights abuses and their invasion of the south China sea, while understanding the country well enough to recognize that the country is full of complex, cultured people that can be met on common ground rather than as faceless, alien enemies.

great perspective.

definitely an asset to the Harris white house.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Too bad the nuances are buried deep down, and the article starts off with all the criticism, we all know most people never get past.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

1st paragraph starts off with how he speaks Chinese and has traveled there often, 2nd mentions that some people don't like that, and then quotes waltz saying that the US-China relationship doesn't need to be adversarial.

nuance up top, no worries.

but my tldr is for anyone who doesn't want to read anyway.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your summary is fine, I just don't like that the article paints him as pro China in the beginning. And only way down show the strong criticism he has towards China too.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Thanks.

I think the photo is the glaring problem.

After all, Walz is pro-China as in the language, culture and people, he's anti-human rights abuses and government authoritarianism.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

as a German American political news reads like this:

high ranking idiot says idiot thing.

another high ranking dumbass managed to say something even dumber.

finally, the republican presidential candidate shat himself while starting a sentence that nobidy expected him to finish anyway.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

this article is more informative and relevant than most

you're referring to the other 90% of American political news, and i see why you would give up picking through the trash after a while

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh wow, you must be reading way higher quality news than what I get.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Well, it's the UK so they do have the BBC.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Complete bullshit article parroting what the opposition say about Walz, because that way they can't be accused of libel according to (moronic) laws. The truth is quite the opposite:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgewpzyd91o

he chose 4 June - the day Beijing sent the troops in - as the date of their wedding five years later. She said that "he wanted to have a date he'll always remember".

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Me thinks you didn't read the whole thing