this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
101 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

33721 readers
377 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Klicnik@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There sure are a lot of "Google enshittifies Google" articles lately.

[–] toototabon@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

isn't this a good change though?

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's actually a good change, IMHO. You can just click directly on page 10 for anything that might be related to your original search.

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I suspect it is so that they can place ads / AI at the top of every page

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

If I remember correctly from the good ol' days, promoted sites/ads kinda stopped after the first few pages and it skipped past most of the SEO crap.

But yeah, I forgot how aggressive Google is with ads and AI now, those bastards.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

10yrs ago if have said yes… however, I feel like page 1 is only ads and images to ads and sponsored content so I end up on page 2 anyway, so now I have to click a button.

[–] Midnight1938@reddthat.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

I remember the time page 2 of google was equivalent to an underground crypt.

How the times deteriorate

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Absolutely, this change makes it harder for people to quickly scroll away ads at the top & for ad blockers to seamlessly hide ads. With ad blockers your first page will be mostly empty & make google more annoying to use.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 2 weeks ago

That was the whole point. They're making sure you don't scroll past that first page.

At some point they'll probably just show a full page unskippable ad after you press search. 😄

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

There sure are a lot of "Google enshittifies Google" articles lately.

They are trying to keep up with Microsoft.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

DuckDuckGo.com

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’m cynically viewing this as not a positive. I assume this is so they can make pages 2, 3 and so on as spammy as page 1.

Not at first, obviously. You don’t boil that frog on high heat.
You throw out a second page with a cute little text ad off to the side, then 1 or 2 at the top, then a mid-page ad. Maybe some suggested content.

Instead of having to scroll through a page’s worth of ads to get to semi-relevant results with a gem hidden in them, it’ll be a pages worth of ads for your semi-relevant results per page, and maybe what you were looking for 4 or 5 pages in.

Google used to be good. They ‘know’ what people are looking for. So they’ll probably hire someone familiar with gambling to figure out a minimum dispersion of relevant results on the pages, to keep people using the service and scrolling past ads. … I used to remember this. Variable-ratio reward schedule?

[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Rare case of a good change coming from google

[–] PHLAK@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Everything old is new again.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remove ads and AI garbage next please.

[–] dvdnet62@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is possible with ublock origin or browser extension

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Or Startpage. Mojeek. Searx. Qwant. The lot..

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 7 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, good news from google is rare

[–] small44@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Good, one less browser extension to remove.

[–] dvdnet62@feddit.nl 6 points 2 weeks ago

In case you miss infinite scroll. There is browser extension and JS script for that

[–] 555_1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Goo—glé? What is this? A baby web website or something? Goo goo gah gah.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago

Literally didn't even know it had it? Is this only in the google app? I always remember pages on the site.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The latest feature headed to the Google graveyard is continuous scrolling on search results, according to a report from Search Engine Land.

The user experience, which mirrored the endless scrolling behavior of social media feeds, was originally introduced for search results on mobile devices in October of 2021 and then brought over to desktop search results in late 2022.

A Google spokesperson reportedly told Search Engine Land that continuous scroll is being removed today from desktop search results, while the feature will be removed from mobile results “in the coming months.”

In its place on desktop will be Google’s classic pagination bar, allowing users to jump to a specific page of search results or simply click “Next” to see the next page.

On mobile, a “More results” button will be shown at the bottom of a search to load the next page.

Google told Search Engine Land that “this change is to allow the search company to serve the search results faster on more searches, instead of automatically loading results that users haven’t explicitly requested.”


The original article contains 175 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

They already have on mobile.