this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
33 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

37737 readers
337 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to their studies, the older we get, the more we will match our name. Wild, but interesting theory.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 25 points 3 months ago

What? That sounds like absolute hokum. It's like saying variable names change the data they contain.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds stupid and ridiculous as fuck.

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, no! You see, the specific combination of sounds that we use to identify and address a given person shapes that persons body, especially their facial features!

How else would you explain how every person over 50 named Henry looks exactly the same‽ Or why people over 50 named Charles and Charlie look so similar?

I'm 44, and have a friend who is 43, and has the exact same name, and everyone we know always comments on how they're 100% certain we will look like twins in 7 years.

It's just science. Get your head out of the sand!

Hell, I wouldn't be the least amount surprised if everyone over 50 named Gretchen not only look identical, but are also the exact same height. I guess that's an idea for their next study. I can't wait to be proven right.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to read how my day tomorrow — and, incidentally, that of the other 1/12 (roughly) of the planet born with the same zodiac sign — is going to turn out.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Doug Bowser, President of Nintendo America, enters the chat.

[–] sdc@infosec.pub 5 points 3 months ago

Top example of nominative determinism.

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ooooooh so that's why my face changed when I changed my first name. I thought it was the hormones, but no, t'was the new name!

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

at 50, everyone has the face he deserves.

Welp, I'm screwed.

Btw this is a clear example where in statistics, temporal order does not imply causality.

We clearly are given our names waaay before our adult faces develop; and yet, it's more likely that our genetic traits (and therefore adult faces) determine the name, rather than the other way around.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

Writers of children's names books are going to have a field day with the data from this study.

While reading through the comments, I also found this interesting thing:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouba/kiki_effect

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I couldn't find a picture of the most made-up sounding real name I have ever heard: Colonel Sturmhard Eisenkeil (Stormhard Ironwedge) of the German army.

I am stealing that mmand name for tabletop