this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
47 points (92.7% liked)

Green Energy

2110 readers
38 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copies of the article: archive.today ghostarchive.org web.archive.org

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Was it not here yet? What changed?

Edit: Ah. Better drilling techniques, ironically, pioneered by the fossil fuel industry!

Latimer and his colleagues improved on traditional geothermal techniques in several ways. But the biggest was this: They utilized horizontal drilling, boring about 10,000 feet down and then 5,000 feet to the side with each well. The technology has been around for decades, but it’s gotten a lot less expensive since the mid-2000s due to widespread adoption by oil and gas companies.

Nice that this drilling technology can be used in green energy applications too.

[–] gandalf_der_12te 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think geothermal is a scam?

I remember reading somewhere that geothermic heat basically doesn't replenish (or only does so at geological timescales), and by extracting heat from underground we're basically depleting the underground heat reservoir, leading to shrinkage of the ground and therefore possible cracks in buildings.

TL;DR: It's not truly renewable, but rather renewable only on geological timescales (similar to fossil fuels).

[–] Antitoxic9087@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

It is highly dependent of the local geological conditions. Convection-based geothermal plants (those with hot spring flowing around) probably have less constraints on heat extraction limit. Conduction-based geothermal plants will face more problems.

In some shallow geothermal use case the ground is used as seasonal heat storage so heat renewable rate is not an issue.