this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Science

12941 readers
48 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unions are joining the Biden administration’s campaign to promote scientific integrity and protect scientists from political interference

Earlier this month, the union representing thousands of scientists and engineers at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed a new contract that includes protections for government workers who stand up for scientific integrity. A similar provision was included in a union contract at the US Department of Agriculture last year, and negotiators for the union representing more than 5,000 early-career scientists at the National Institutes of Health are following suit. A contract could be signed in the next several months.

These collective bargaining agreements are the latest front in an ongoing effort to shield US science agencies from political interference. The administration of US President Joe Biden, who this week bowed out of the race for November’s presidential election, has already crafted legal protections for government scientists and other workers. It is now rushing to finalize scientific-integrity policies at dozens of federal agencies.

Political meddling in science has long been a bipartisan affair, but the current movement is fuelled by fears that former president Donald Trump will regain the office. Trump’s first term as president proved disastrous for scientists at the EPA and other science agencies, and many fear that a second term would be even worse.

If Trump wins November’s election, the next question is what will happen with the US Congress. If Republicans were to retain control over the House of Representatives and seize control of the Senate, Trump would have at least two years of free rein to reshape the government to his liking.

“People should not be confident that we have the legal tools to effectively respond to abuses of power in a second Trump administration,” says Blake Emerson, an administrative-law researcher at the University of California, Los Angeles.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Trump wins and congress swings in his favor, America is lost. Full stop. There’s no point worrying about the rule of law after that. The only way out of that dead-end road is via violent revolution.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

True.

If you're a wage worker, though, America's already lost. Every time I hear about the 16,000,000 new jobs the Biden Administration has created, I have to remind myself that most of these are second and third jobs, because the majority can't live off of one anymore. In Mississippi, where the minimum wage is still $7 an hour, you'd need to be making at least $28 an hour to be able to afford to live and start a family, at minimum.

And that's not even considering health care and education, both of which are cost-prohibitive now for most.

If you're working for a wage in this country, you're already living under fascism.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 24 points 1 month ago

If Trump wins November’s election, the next question is what will happen with the US Congress. If Republicans were to retain control over the House of Representatives and seize control of the Senate, Trump would have at least two years of free rein to reshape the government to his liking.

Well, let's do our best to stop that horror show from occurring.