this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
41 points (75.3% liked)

Patriots for Progress πŸ¦…πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ¦…

70 readers
15 users here now

Welcome to Patriots for Progress. Round these parts, we roleplay as American conservatives and use all the reactionary buzzwords while continuing to produce leftist and communist propaganda.

Rule 1: No special snowflake white supremacist nonsense, or any other kind of bigotry

Rule 2: No big city econ major capitalism talk. And no centrism either, the LORD gave us the second amendment for a reason

Rule 3: AMERICAN PATRIOTS ONLY πŸ¦…πŸ¦…πŸ¦…!!! This is America, so you'd best speak English, Navajo, Cherokee, or some other American language!

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have no idea what this post is trying to say

[–] Liome@pawb.social 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Two XX chromosomes = biological female, XY chromosomes = biological male. If jesus had no father, he couldn't have Y chromosome, so he couldn't be a man, which is conservative argument against trans people.

Cool idea, but probably too smart for people who argue that chromosomes and gender are the same thing. Besides, if you already believe in god and magic, then saying that Y chromosome appeared out of thin air isn't that far off.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Well, we country people have our own homespun wisdom, and I do admit it may be beyond some city-slicking folks' abilities to comprehend. But the fact that Jesus Christ our lord and saviour was transgender is not that complicated. He told us that our faith could move mountains, and sure enough, it was our faith in Him that made Him a man. Just as it is our faith that makes anyone a man, woman, or nonbinary. It ain't no fancy cell culture under a microscope that tells anybody who they really are.

[–] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

If jesus had no father, he couldn’t have Y chromosome, so he couldn’t be a man, which is conservative argument against trans people.

I think your logic proves that the Father and/or the Holy Ghost are male.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trans men are got damned men, and I won't tolerate any city folk telling me different

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think I get you. I hope

Trans men are men

AKA an AFAB transitioning to male, are men!

AKA IN FULL SUPPORT OF TRANS GENDER RIGHTS.

I truly hope you mean that.

If you are saying you want to misgender people? Thats where we will strongly disagree.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If a man who was born with a hoo-ha decides he's a man, then he is. That's his individual right as an AMERICAN. It ain't the government, it ain't no scientist, and it ain't his parents if they think different neither. It ain't nobody's business prying into someone's personal life to decide who they are. I suggest you have a mosey on over to the sidebar if you want to understand how we do things in these parts.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gotcha! Totally agree.

I wanted to be clear I thought we were on the same side of the issue, and I think we are?

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We sure are. You got some traditional American values, pardner. Trans rights are AMERICAN rights! πŸ¦…πŸ¦…πŸ¦…

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Im British, but I appreciate it all the same

[–] ValorieAF@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Damn straight bruther

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Uhoh guess internet has reached deep Alabama swamps

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't Mary get pregnant with Jesus by Zeus, or something like that?

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was a virgin birth. The lord chose her to bear her son, and there was no man involved. No male chromosomes, or any other of these Harvard "genius" terms for what them liberals think makes a man.

[–] amotio@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And it only took one bad translation to get from "young woman" to "virgin".

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

It's probably not a bad translation, when they invented the story of Jesus birth they wanted it to fit prophesy and cultural expectation - this is also why his mom was free from the original sin everyone else has, John the Baptist likewise but the church doesn't fully go in on that one.

Regardless of Jesus being a real person or not his childhood is very clearly invented to fit the story, and its a magical story so its to be expected that it starts with magic.

It of course causes endless problems theologically if you take any of it seriously, Mary being free of original sin since her conception means that God had her marked out as the mother of Jesus from birth which kinda ruins free-will but also the very point of Jesus is that original sin can't be removed without the most precious sacrifice- the son of god... but Mary and depending on your opinion John had it removed at birth without any sacrifice - so based on the two facts that God knew Mary would be Jesus mom from birth therefore also that Jesus would die on the cross then the entire thing is meaningless theater - he holds the power to remove original sin at will and the little drama couldn't have gone any other way.

This sort of convoluted logic has bothered theologians for millenia, it's the problem when a story created to convince illiterate fanatics that your version of the current meme religion is the one to give money to turns into the cornerstone of society and the base upon which everything stands for a third of the world.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Based and HRT pilled.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This one took me a second to connect the dots lol

[–] BadApe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

What in the AI-generated bullshit fuckery is that monstrosity of an image?