You mean the conservatives were -- gasp -- not the good fiscal stewards they claimed to be, and left leftists holding the bag for their profligate ways? What a weird fluke that I'm sure isn't a common trend at all!
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
201 points (99.5% liked)
World News
38553 readers
2649 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
And people will be angry at the leftists for telling them that it will cost money to fix shit and they'll vote the right back in power so they can fuck things up even more? 😱
I kind of hate that the US "founding fathers" were kind of right in their assessment that the "common person" is wayyyyyy too fucking stupid and too easily swayed by propaganda to be trusted to vote.
I can't say I agree with their conclusion that only rich people deserve to vote though. Not sure what the right path is :(
It's a very slippery slope. Clearly land/business owners, race, gender, etc are not the way.
Political fluency? A test to see if you've been following current events and can answer basic questions? The positives would be a more informed pool of electorates, but it would also substantially diminish the amount of voters, exclude those that have grievances but don't have time for politics, and the questions could be manipulated by the current government to exclude voters likely to vote for the opposition.
I also don't know what the answer is. I'm leaning towards this being a symptom of dysfunction rather than something that needs an easy workaround. If we can actually tackle poverty and bring education up people will be much more likely to vote rationally, but I don't know how we get there WITH thr current system we have.
Political fluency? A test to see if you’ve been following current events and can answer basic questions? The positives would be a more informed pool of electorates, but it would also substantially diminish the amount of voters, exclude those that have grievances but don’t have time for politics, and the questions could be manipulated by the current government to exclude voters likely to vote for the opposition.
The test:
Exactly.
Given the state the last government was run by Tories, I hope it will be a long time before we see them get into power again.
It’s almost as if that was the plan all along
20 billion is what the NI tax cuts cost by the way. Deliberate sabotage by the outgoing government that knew they were not going to win.
The Tories took a shit on the desk before they left.
Alas. If only there were 165 billionaires in the UK you could get to kick in their share. If you had only 350 people/families holding a trillion in wealth, you could get out of this.
Nah, just cut more benefits from those struggling. /tories
You know damn well that after they go for the poor billionaires' money, they will come for ours! /rightwinger.
And you know, I'm a bit of an optimist. Might as well vote in billionaires' interests on the odd chance I become one.
Would be a shame only being able to afford 3 yachts instead of 5.
The funny thing is, lots of luxury goods are not priced based on costs, but on demand. That means that if the rich get lower taxes, the values of expensive art and fine wines just go up to match the extra money they have. They can't buy more.
It's the opposite with things the middle class needs. If more people can afford a washing machine, costs can actually decrease because of better manufacturing. There are many washing machine manufacturers, so there's actually some competition.
London set itself up as an industrial and financial hub for an empire. Then the empire went...but they joined the EU, deindustrialized...but kept the tech industry and finance (some say money laundering) hub...now the children of deinstrialization took them out of the EU and the UK is now the financial heart of an empire without a major market to pump blood through...shit's gonna be tough.
We pay some of the highest taxes in the world yet we are poor? Surely this is corruption.
See what 14 years of stories picking apart public institutions does to a country...
You paid taxes? Then you must not be a billionaire.
Yeah pretty much the root of it. I posted above that the UK has 165 billionaires. You'd think they could get money out of those people to help fund society.