this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53448 readers
851 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure many of you are already aware that YouTube has been rolling out anti-adblock detection for Chrome users for a few weeks now.

Today, as a long time Firefox user with the fantastic uBlock Origin extension installed, I got my first anti-adblock popup on the platform. Note that this may not happen to you personally for a while, but it is inevitably coming for everyone.

Thankfully, the fine folks at uBlock Origin have already advised a simple workaround (on Reddit, yuck!) which I will duplicate in a simplified form below for your convenience. I have tested it on Firefox and it is working fine for me (so far).

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW ALL OF THE INSTRUCTIONS IN THIS POST.

  1. Update uBO to the latest version (1.52.0+) . <== The extension itself, for technical improvements. You do this in your browser.

  2. Remove your custom config / reset to defaults. <== This means removing your custom filters (or disabling My filters) and disabling ALL additional lists you've enabled. It might be quicker to make a backup of your config and restore to defaults instead.

  3. Force an update of your Filter Lists. <== This is within the extension. Lists are what determine what's blocked or not. How to update Filter lists: Click 🛡️ uBO's icon > the ⚙ Dashboard button > the Filter lists pane > the 🕘 Purge all caches button > the 🔃 Update now button.

  4. Disable all other extensions AND your browser's built-in blockers. <== No need to uninstall, just disable them. They might interfere with our solutions.

Make sure you follow all 4 points above. If you're seeing the message, it's likely due to your custom config (either additional lists or separate filters in My filters).

Restarting your browser afterwards may help too.

Once you've gotten rid of the issue on default settings, you can slowly start restoring your config (if you really need it). Do it gradually, to easier find out what was causing the issue in the first place. Once you find the culprit, simply skip it in your config.

If you want to use Enhancer for YouTube*, you have to* disable its adblocking*.*

May the ~~force~~ uBlock Origin be with you!

Update

Just wanted to mention a few things that have been pointed out in the comments:

  • There are quite a few projects that provide an alternative ad-free front end to YouTube. These include Invidious, FreeTube, LibreTube, Newpipe, Revanced, and I'm sure there are several more options I've missed. I don't have any particular preference really but I routinely use NewPipe on my cellphone just because I tried it once and couldn't be bothered trying all the others.
  • In step 4 listed above, to clarify, afaik you only need to remove adblocker extensions (if you have more than one installed) that might conflict with the uBlock Origin rules and trigger the anti-adblock, not all extensions.
  • If you hate non-stop ads but want to support your favorite content creators then be sure to give them some love on Patreon or whatever alternative options they provide. Creators typically make only a tiny, tiny fraction of what YouTube makes in ad revenue, assuming YouTube doesn't just outright steal the lot, and it's a shitty business model that's ruining the internet. Even if you watch the ads, you're only supporting YouTube most of the time, not the creators.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] khorovodoved@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Alternative solution: Since YouTube disabled all ads in Russia, you can just use russian vpn/proxy for the most effective YouTube adblocking possible.

[–] Octopus1348@thelemmy.club 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why did they disable ads there?

[–] khorovodoved@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Ukraine use ads for anti-putin propaganda. So the russian goverment told Google to moderate ads, or all Google services will be banned. Google decided to just disable ads in Russia completely.

[–] Administrator@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago

Thanks for a solution that nobody will ever use

[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I'd rather deal with the ads until they make me go insane than do that.

[–] Golther@infosec.pub -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wow! What a great idea! What could be better than routing all your traffic through a Russian VPN provider and probably bypassing sanctions? What could possibly go wrong?

[–] smooth_tea@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Please do tell what could go wrong. Is the internet sheriff going to turn up?

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Good evenin' ma'am sniff * tips hat * so, we're in bed with the commies eh ?

[–] red@sopuli.xyz -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Having all your data routed through Russia. What could gp wrong indeed. On top of that the VPN purchase giving more money for Russia.

[–] smooth_tea@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nothing is going to happen when your traffic moves through Russia. In fact, you have more chance that something will happen to you if you don't.

[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

must be why the Ruzzians are axing all non-state approved VPNs. I wonder why they want to have control over VPNs, almost like they want to ensure only certain content gets through or the ability to monitor traffic. Oh but that would be so silly.

[–] smooth_tea@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What is silly is the idea that that is in any way relevant to what we were discussing here. And I use the word discussing lightly. There's a big difference between the insinuation that a foreigner is at risk for tunneling into the Russia and the Russian government eavesdropping on its population.

[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

It is very relevant actually.

For starters tunneling there will mean having sites blocked, and secondly a foreogn government having my data, particularly an enemy authoritarian state, is no better than a corporation or my own state (where at least I have some say to what happens to my data)

[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Even your dog will get hacked

[–] MaxPower@feddit.de -1 points 10 months ago

Nice try, Roskomnadzor

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hey Google, maybe you assholes should realize that if people are willing to jump through this many hoops to not watch ads then maybe you should realize that ads are the problem, not users. Nobody wants ads shoved down their throat so kindly go fuck yourselves. Advertising is a cancer. I've been trying to convince people how dangerous attention grabbing billboards are but nobody seems to care.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

There's no fucking way I gonna watch a 20 seconds ad for a 10 seconds video.

[–] merci3@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Alternatively, some folks can also try Freetube for an ad free youtube experience as a desktop app

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Anyone else remember the first ad-pocalypse?

Like when OG AdBlock was created and there was an all-out race between individual websites and AdBlock?

Then OG AdBlock sold out and allowed "approved" ads to still show.

We are seeing history repeat. The only reason ads survived was due to increasing number of users who weren't using adblock.

Now, with market saturation, Google is starting to fight back.

I would absolutely love to see a revitalization on proxy software specifically designed to eliminate ads and tracking. I haven't looked into this in quite some time but I think we're crossing into this territory now.

The pessimist in me says to look out for a bill authored by Google to make adblocking illegal.

But the optimist in me says "the Internet sees censorship as damage and routes around it."

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would absolutely love to see a revitalization on proxy software specifically designed to eliminate ads and tracking.

You're in luck because we already have several. Namely Piped and Invidious.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Do regular apps and desktop applications like freetube and newpipe count?

[–] miracleorange@beehaw.org 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Alternative workaround: just use Piped or Invidious.

[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Don't act like YouTube won't crack down on those as well. YouTube getting more aggressive about ads is bad for everyone.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Got my first popup today, but apart from it being annoying literally nothing changed. Still no ads.

[–] A_Asselin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago

I started using freetube for linux a month or so ago. This is so much better than native youtube. The entire interface is smoother, I get less "loading" moments (none really) and it does not try and constantly reduce my resolution by "auto adjusting". No ads, no BS. Just better all around.

[–] Gamey@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

It's a little hit or miss and fairly unstable at times but I use Piped to avoid any of that shit!

[–] RandomPancake@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see a lot of people saying "but that's how creators get paid".

Listen: I didn't put ads on my video. YouTube did. I can't take them off and I don't see a cent from them. Block away.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Except they don't. They get demonetization from literally breathing from Google who treats them like shit, so it's best to donate to their patreons anyway.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Their demonetization "policy" or lack thereof is a major reason why I block ads. I don't believe that Alphabet operates in good faith in this matter.

[–] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The RIAA and MPAA are the driving force behind the copystrike behavior. I do think Alphabet has the resources and standing to resist and battle it in court, but that's clearly not their business model. Alphabet is not invested in protecting content generators, only in what metrics they can sell to ad agencies.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not a copyright problem. You get demonitized for saying "suicide" for example. They want an artificial happy place where no bad things happen and we can all have fun watching ads forever.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

.. and rape and sexual assault and pedophile.. some videos (like on cults) are really weird to watch cus so many words are bleeped out.

[–] onichama@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thank you for the comprehensible instructions!
Unfortunately, it doesn't work with Edge (yet?).

Ayo who tf uses Edge?

Me, sadly, as it is the only browser installed on my work pc. We can't install any other programs (working with highly sensitive data).

EDIT: It works now :D

[–] tiita@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't even mind giving some money to youtube if it was asking for donations or keep the the prices low and accessible, like $4 max per month to support the up keep)

YouTube could be one of the wonders of the world of we are looking at it at a content perspective.

It should be almost protected by UNESCO, if you ask me.. yes even the stupid stuff as it is a record of mankind.

But google instead of recognising the value, they got greedy.

humankin created a massive information library which google at some point decided to monetize.

We all know what happened to unity right, just as a recent example ? it doesn't take much to turn the users away, and I truly believe, even youtube can fail

[–] Raz@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unity has competition. That's why people could leave.

YouTube will (unfortunately) not fail, because there is no viable competition. I was subscribed to Nebula for a while, but obviously that doesn't have nearly the amount of content YT has.

[–] Aetherion@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the competition would be to stop consuming that much and instead search for the content you like in the remaining free part of the internet

[–] geissi@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

the content you like

The content I like is on youtube though

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can youtube detect my pihole blocking ads

[–] randombullet@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

No. YouTube ads are servered under the same DNS record.

[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

"(on Reddit (/comments/). yuck!)"

Guys, we fucking get it. You hate mainstream apps like reddit but the solutions aren't on Lemmy until someone finds them elsewhere like reddit.

Do we really need to emphasize our hate for something every damn time we make a post. Thanks for the solution but why couldn't you have just posted the solution.

God I hate Lemmy, they want a bigger user base to stay away from content controlled by big corps and to move to federated content but will shove their ideals on the community every time and that is what keeps pushing people wanting to stay here away. We don't need to hear about FOSS and Linux every time. And we get it. We hate reddit that is why the user base moved here.

EDIT: God I love Lemmy.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Nice try spez. Kindly fuck off now.

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Those who disagree with what YouTube is doing, why don't you stop using it? No views = creators are forced to find another platform.

I think working around their service T&C is just as scummy as anti-adblocks.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

But no ads = no money for youtube and creators. So won't they have to find another platform anyways? The answer is no, because there are plenty of people watching youtube on smart TVs or the regular youtube app without any kind of adblocking.
It really does not matter what we few nerds here are doing or not doing.

[–] free@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

~youtube-dl~

[–] jsdz@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've just noticed that this is in c/piracy. I suppose there's lots of interest in the story here and everywhere else, but I'd just like to remind you all that ad-blocking is not piracy.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I do think it is piracy, for me piracy is taking what you want exactly how you want it and don't ask for it, absolute freedom.

We small people don't have the possibilities as the rich to save much money with tax tricks or anything similar, so this is how we're compensating.

I rather have piracy seen more positively than distant certain areas from it. Just my opinion.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

i hope that the combination of ublock and pihole will get me through this, but we will see

[–] SparkyTemper@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's the route I'm planning to go to next. Good luck.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Thanks, up until now it was a total success.

Additionally I use the duckduckgo vpn on mobile for when I'm on the go.