this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53843 readers
542 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flathead@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Operating Revenue: 33,723,297,000

Cost of Revenue: 19,715,368,000

Gross Profit: 14,007,929,000

Operating Expense: 7,053,926,000

Operating Income: 6,954,003,000

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

"Our profits may be obscene, but they're not obscene enough! How could these evil pirates ever do this to us?"

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I like dividing net profit by total employees in 2022 they could pay everyone $350k extra that year.

4.49bil/12800

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

All we can do is 50k and some fruits in the office.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Solution: create a common platform for all online services (Netflix, Paramount, Disney, Warner, ...) and have EVERYTHING there, even old movies and not often seen ones.

[–] venji10@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

And also remove Digital Restrictions Management (DRM)

[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Once, not so long ago, streaming was more convenient than pirating. But, as expected the commercial services went through their Standard Cycle of Enshittification and now we either let ourselves get flogged by 50 competing predatory services or just take the easy way and sail the high seas.

The choice is not that hard. Yarr.

Of course this returns us to the state where the streaming companies who have literally "enshitted their own beds" now turn to legislators and policymakers (who they hated, just couple of weeks ago) to ask them to provide some "law and order" to this unruly mob and to defend the corporations right to put thumbscrews on the population for ever increasing profits.

And so it goes.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd love some kind of federated streaming service. So that different content providers can sell their stuff, you pay once monthly into a pool, and you can choose different clients to access all content services. Then the money gets distributed depending on your viewing habits.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Legislators could just offer a very easy solution. They could simply mandate copyright holders to offer the copyright to all interested parties at a fair price. If content ist held back or only exclusively distributed through one party it should go public domain, as the holder of the rights clearly does not intend to profit in a legitimate way from.

The intend of copyright is to make sure, that the holder of the right can get a fair compensation. It is not the intend that his work is abused to manipulate the markets.

[–] sverit@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

SurprisedPikachuFace.jpg

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

2013 Netflix competed just fine. Piracy was mostly dead back then

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But 2013 Netflix didn't have to compete with Prime Video, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, HBO Max, Apple TV, Hulu, Peacock, or any of the million "add-on" channels that Amazon uses as an excuse to paywall you off from the content.

The fact that they all run in their own UI, desperate the shove the next instalment of mediocrity down your throat, means that I've gone back to piracy. It's just much easier to type what I'm after into Radarr or Sonarr than it is to go through the services to see what's available. Sure, I can use Justwatch, but 80% of the time what I'm after isn't on anything I have.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

More competition should mean lower prices. How is competition diving prices up? Seems rigged.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Same amount of content, more players, outbidding each other, passing on those lovely reverse savings.

See if it was like music, with a massive back catalogue available to everyone, you'd have four or five services competing on price. But it isn't. And it will suffer for that.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

if it was like music

If it were* like music

When using be in an if clause for an unreal conditional sentence, always conjugate it as were, no matter what the subject is. Even if the subject is first-person singular (I) or third-person singular (he, she, or it), still use were with an if clause in unreal conditional sentences.

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/conditional-sentences-was-instead-of-were/

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Calling people out for their grammar isn't cool anymore; now we just let one another live in peace. You should try it.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Your comment makes no sense to me. It was never cool, and it isn't now.

[–] nintendiator@feddit.cl 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it was never cool, there's no need to extra uncool it now.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it can be made any more uncool than it already is

[–] nintendiator@feddit.cl 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it was possible, you could!

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Aha! You're now expecting me to be bigger than myself, but I'm a very, very small person, therefore:

If it were* possible

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When using be in an if clause for an unreal conditional sentence

*When using "be" in an "if" clause for an unreal conditional sentence

When referring to words, use quotation marks for clarity.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Great suggestion, thank you

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Oh no!

Anyways

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've never seen a magnet link respond with "this is not available in your country".

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They won't even let you watch stuff like anime with subtitles if it's not dubbed in your language. Like why?

[–] mke@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I know very little about this topic, do not take this as fact. One possible reason is licensing issues. It's a mess. Not an unsolvable one, but one that pirates usually don't have to deal with.

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Might be licensing but I think it's actually just that they will hide everything that's not dubbed in the language you speak because I didn't find anything on Netflix (back when I had it) that wasn't dubbed in German

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

It's just US managers who cannot imagine people speaking more than one language

[–] anguo@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In Disney+, in order to watch anything in French, you have to change the language of the entire interface to French for the option to appear. And then you lose most other languages.

The only reason I have a Disney+ subscription is because it's hard to find kids' shows in languages other than English in the high seas. And they make it so friggin' difficult for no reason.

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Finding stuff in German is also really hard. Wish I had a torrent tracker or usenet indexer/provider that had more German stuff.

[–] TwoCubed@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean actual German shows/movies or German dubs of shows/movies?

I was raised in the Netherlands and I'm fairly sure that German Society is so braindead because they never had to indulge in foreign languages. Just teach your kid English, it'll be good for everyone. Kids absorb other languages like a sponge.

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean German dubs. Also, there's a lot of immigrants here so a lot of people speak more than just German and English and we do learn other languages like French or Spanish in school but it's mostly optional or only if you continue school after 10th grade. Calling us all braindead because we're not forced to learn languages that we'll never use is not very nice.

[–] TwoCubed@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

I have lived in Germany for over 30 years now. I just saw the difference between the Netherlands and Denmark vs Germany. It's kind of sad how we shut ourselves into our own little language bubble, yet the world has so much to offer. I prefer watching movies in French/Spanish/Japanese/whatever with subtitles. I believe that a huge portion of the trade that is acting is conveyed through language. By overdubbing these movies a lot of the actual appeal is lost.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They had piracy all but beat. It was their insatiable greed that drove people back to the sea.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

One should acknowledge that this is not on Netflix alone.
Other media companies pulling their content to set up their own streaming services has fractured the market and made each individual service much worse in the process.