this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1324 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 30 points 5 hours ago

This kind of shit should not be tolerated.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 36 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Advertising targeted towards minors needs to be banned.

[–] veggibles@lemmy.wtf 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Advertising ~~targeted towards minors~~ needs to be banned.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Advertising itself isn't a bad thing.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

No, it's.. it's pretty bad.

[–] mcv@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

I know one example of advertising that I liked: the creators of Penny Arcade had only advertisements for computer games that they liked. And they made those ads in the same art style as their own comic.

Advertisements are good when they're an honest endorsement. Any others are inherently deceptive and often invasive.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Some level of advertising is a necessary evil when you're in a capitalist system because otherwise people have no way to get their products out ti the market. There's a balance to be struck.

Hell even in other systems advertising is still important for finding out about cool new things even if money no longer exists

If money doesn't exist how do you pay for the ads?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They can put up signs inside their business windows. That's plenty. Everything is a blight.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

It's not 1950 anymore.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 6 points 4 hours ago

All ads suck, but ads based on user rather than content go too far.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

lol, Jesus. It is like what a screen writer would come up with for a movie that contained a terrible company run by terrible people doing stuff so outlandishly terrible everyone watching would think "the absurdity of the terrible is how you know it is made up".

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The book is very good. Reading it now. The writer starts off with a great story about a shark attack.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Did he choose electrocution over the shark attack?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 11 hours ago

can't believe a social network started by incels in college to rate girls sexually would do something like this.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 46 points 12 hours ago

Facebook... now even more toxic than previously known!

[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 78 points 13 hours ago

That's 0% surprising. FB had always been about making girls feel bad. It's in its sorce code

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

even a scathing rant about surveillance capitalism becomes fodder for the machine, as you can clearly see with the ads on this page. 

Ads? I can see no ads...

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 68 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

TIL teen girls still used Facebook.

[–] guywithoutaname@lemm.ee 58 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Instagram too according to the article.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago

I get Instagram (lots of creative types there), Facebook is a bit surprising though.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 41 points 17 hours ago

Goddam I had to read that headline 3 times before I understood the implication!
That is outright disgusting, and such practices ought to be outlawed.
Or as Trump would say, very cool and very legal way to make money.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 59 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Happy I got AdNauseam after uBlock Origin. Deleted my facebook a year ago, shit is an AI slopfest built upon the greed and manipulation of every part of the chain. Defcon 31 has a good talk that brings this up. "Disenshittify or die" by Cory Doctrow, cann recommend to watch.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

What's AdNauseam?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I support the use of AdNauseam. Not sure if there are any more extreme alternatives, I now choose to be actively hostile towards advertising/tracking rather than just passively blocking it.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

My dad has been talking about wanting something like AdNauseam for years, i was very happy when i found it. The extra mile would probably be to expand it with a VPN and constantly spam clicks, clear cache, switch IP and obfuscate data. Now we just wait for someone with enough time to build it...

[–] vegetvs@kbin.earth 85 points 19 hours ago (21 children)

Teenagers should not be on social media. I rest my case.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I hearby petition an amendment for an expansion of the child protective laws to widen the definition of abuse, neglect, and reckless abandonment of children to include:

"letting children browse without ad blockers"

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They shouldn't, but also PSA to any parents but modern parenting advice typically is to let your kids use social media if they choose, and guide them through the social and emotional difficulties with good communication. Don't blanket ban it because they'll just use it anyways without guidance, and be unprepared the moment they turn 18.

It's a case of: 99.9% of kids are smoking cigarettes so yours will too. Better to show them how to use a weekly cigar without inhaling, than just ban it which won't work.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 44 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not just teenagers. Facebook and quite a few others should outright be banned. Not only they are scientifically proven to be a mental health catastrophe and a political threat to democracy, it's also pretty clear now that both these things are part of their design, not bugs or unintended emerging properties.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 9 points 13 hours ago

Facebook actively contributed to the genocide in Myanmar, and did basically nothing about it because they didnt want to hire more moderators that spoke the language, so that they could adequately remove pro-genocidal content

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 315 points 23 hours ago (17 children)

At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 136 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Saint Luigi deliver us from villains like Facebook

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago

Even though Luigi Mangione didn't actually commit any crime and his trial is a flimsy sham, I agree. He is the public face of whoever really did it, and they are an icon of justice.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 46 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.

[–] El_Scapacabra@lemm.ee 24 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

My doctor's office (allegedly) handed my info to a plastic surgery clinic so they could send me a "happy 40th birthday, now fix your sagging bullshit!"-email the literal day I turned 40.

Needless to say that put a damper on things.

People have been doing evil shit for money since the invention of money. These days it's just automated.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 13 points 13 hours ago

I'd call my former Dr's office and flip my shit. Them giving out your info may have been a HIPAA violation. You should really follow up and harass the fuck out of them.

[–] RedPostItNote@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Uh that’s new doctor time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›