this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
1095 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

7972 readers
1714 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1095
Limited Freedom (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by when@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

This will go down in flames.

[–] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago

You remember that first amendment thing we used to have here?

Yeah... neither does our government

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 21 points 5 hours ago

America can't be taken seriously anymore.

It's a good thing Russia gave half of a wakeup call to the rest of the free world to arm the fuck up 3 years ago. We know America can't be relied on for anything anymore.

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 35 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 19 points 5 hours ago

For now. Let's see what happens when it's budget time again. They'll probably bury it in there because we live in hell.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Good. Holy 💩

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How do you enforce anti boycott, how do you force someone to spend their money?

Dont get me wrong Ill know they will try again, but wow.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you’re an American paying taxes you can’t boycott Israel. It doesn’t even need to be a law.

Seems like they’re trying to turn boycott in to a dirty word.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Yes yes I know where my tax dollars go, thank you. Well, ok actually not entirely, but yes to fund the irl fucking evil empire.

But boycotts make me think of private citzens not buying a product, or from a store or provider, etc.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Nazi America

Brought to you by millions of fascist fucks, including your own family and friends.

Buy a gun.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Any government that tells you what you can complain about

Is by definition a Totalerian government

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Worse than that - they're trying to tell us what we can spend our money on.

Which according to the horse shit Citizens United ruling is free speech for corporations. But not the people in em I guess.

[–] bonnashejve@europe.pub 8 points 7 hours ago

how this reminds me russia....

Isn't there already an anti boycott law on the books?

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Hey big shoutout to all the Redditors and Lemmy guys who told me that we can have no restrictions on free speech because if we restrict Nazis they will restrict us if they ever gain power.

Welp, here ya go...like I told you...and many of you blocked and/or banned me for saying it. Ironic.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 hours ago

The bill got pulled. And even if it didn't it's such a blatant and egregious violation of 1A that even Trump's pet judges would have to shoot it down out of fear of the precedent it would set and what would happen if ever they lose power for any length of time.

That's the conversation I've been having with some people cheering on Trump's immigration moves. I've pointed out the machine the individual bricks seems to be building, and when they support that too because Trump will only use it on the "right sort of people" I point out that Trump won't be in power forever, and ask him what he'd think if someone like Harris or AOC had that same power. That's when they suddenly get it, because the idea that the same machinery could be brought against them is not something they consider.

The first question you should ask when considering "Should the government have this power?" is "If the people I oppose the very most had this power, what would they do with it?" If you're not OK with the answer to that, then the government shouldn't have that power.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

5 bucks says the people who told you that were, in fact, nazis

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hard to say. They mostly seemed like college liberals still living at home

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

been my experience that that people saying "We have to protect the nazis" are either nazis, or nazis pretending to be their idea of librul to infiltrate,

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I have a relevant cartoon that I cant post for some reason...will try again...

[(https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c4568c91-00a0-4bb2-b67e-f32dce46183b.jpeg)]

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

The markdown for the pic is slightly incorrect and causing problems on my app so here's the fix:

![link to your image] (https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c4568c91-00a0-4bb2-b67e-f32dce46183b.jpeg)

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You'll never easily get through to those people. They hold idealism over material reality in many cases.

The best way I've found to get even some of them to at least stop and think for a minute is to ask if preventing people from doing things like:

  1. Screaming slurs next to a preschool
  2. Publishing deliberately false information to ruin someone's reputation
  3. Doxxing someone who was mean to you

...is justified. If they say yes, then maybe unlimited free speech isn't perfect, and restricting Nazis could be justified. If they say no, then you'll know they're a lost cause.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is the problem the speech or the people tbat speak it?

[–] Oggyb@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Great question. Intention matters, so many countries focus on speech that can only be malicious, like incitement to violence in the UK or Nazi salutes in Germany.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

People ready and willing to spread violent, harmful hate can be dealt with via the laws they violate. Assult, battey, stalking, theft, etc.

The subtle side is, as always, if your speech cannot persuade the (large) majority that the opposition speech is wrong, then to dismiss the opposition is to become the oppressing minority.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you make the 1st Amendment illegal, the rest of the Constitution cannot be far behind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How tf can u ban a boycott, how is that even possible let alone provable 🤦 Politics aside if I js don't like a brand that endorses or has ties to Israel would I then be subject to charges. How u trynna force people to buy from certain companies, what if I was bruk, would I be breaking the law? 🤡

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

Excuse me I saw you drinking flat water where is your soda stream ice this one get this one

[–] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 28 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

This will probably be used to target protestors and organizers of political movements.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›