this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
682 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23299 readers
3078 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This should be the sticking point to invoke the 25th. Officials need to be loud and make a stink about how Trump can’t tell fact from clear fiction and therefore cannot perform the duties of the office. Make the people of America see the image on the news everyday and make those on his side say out loud if they think it’s fake or real. Half of the masses will never be convinced that he lacks the morality to lead until they’re already in his camps. This is the earliest clear as day moment to act on that which cannot be held to subjective scrutiny or partisanship.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you guys didn't watch the interview it's (to no one's surprise) fucking embarrassing. Terry keeps trying to move on while remaining firm and Trump just sits there being an argumentative shit because Terry refuses to budge. Good on him for keeping his journalistic integrity, and another pile of dicks to Donnie boi to suck.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How do you do it? How do you sit through it without ripping your ears off? I cant stand listening to the guy. Even a toddler sounds more cohesive.. The moment I hear his voice I feel like my brain just killed a million brain cells out of protest.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Honestly the entire time I was suffering but basically was interested in the dude doing the interview. Yeah it hurt. A lot. I think I lasted a minute.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These ones are real, though:

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Can someone explain these to me? They seem like Neo Nazi tattoos.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

They are, he is an extremist Christian. These are all used as dog whistles by Neo Nazi.

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5191413/peter-hegseths-tattoos-are-raising-some-eyebrows

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 77 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (55 children)

That's US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and they are.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

They seem that way because they are that way.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump is delusional. He also said in the interview that tourism has gone up and that the world's respect fir America has improved

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 121 points 3 days ago (11 children)

He thinks the "M S 1 3" in #000 black Ariel font is really part of the picture.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 148 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's surprising Trump's own tattoos don't get more attention.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Full interview is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBwCUPttprw

I really wish some of these reporters would dig in and challenge him. I get that its uncomfortable, but that's your job.

His questions should have been:

  • Do you think he has MS13, marijuana, smile, cross, skull tattooed on his hands? And not added with Photoshop later?
  • Are you saying this combination of tattoos is a code to identify him as a member of MS13? Because gang experts have cast doubt on this interpretation.
  • How many other MS13 members have this exact combination of tattoos on his hand? If its a sign of being a member of the gang, others should have it as well.
  • Do you think a vague and symbolic tattoo is proof of belonging to criminal organization?
  • Does this make your Secretary of Defense a white supremacist? Because he has numerous tattoos associated with that ideology.
  • Do you have any real proof Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13? And if so why did your administration appeal his protected status in 2019?
[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

If he is MS13, why not imprison him in the US? Did you release a known terrorist?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Republicans are fucking pathetic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ijon_the_human@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago (13 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse 111 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

So just to be fair, whoever made that tried to illustrate that the 4 symbols - in their imagination - represent "M S 1 3". Which in itself is ludicrous. And even if they did, that's still no reason to deport him.

Anyhoo, Trump's reply when someone dared try to explain this to him:

“That was Photoshopped? Terry, they’re giving you the big break of a lifetime. You’re doing the interview. I picked you because, frankly, I’d never heard of you, but that’s OK,” Trump said. “You’re not being very nice.”

This is everyday tyranny in action. It's also very dumb and very delusional. Louis XIV levels.

How is this farce still going on?

But then, just yesterday I learned a little about El Salvador and their idiot president. Who am I kidding. As long as the people go with it, it's possible no matter how ludicrous. I still say it's social media algorithms that got us here.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

You didn't highlight the best part of that interview, and something other journalists should start doing, he handed tRump his own ass and never looked or sounded flustered or worried about the results of the interview. He asked hard questions, even some that sounded dumbed down to help tRump's feeble brain understand.

The best part was shortly after this quote, I think, where tRump said how something might not happen, like completing the rest of the interview, and the dude straight said, "we will." The look on tRump's face was like a parent hearing their kid tell them "no" for the first time. But he didn't say anything more. It was a glorious example of how to deal with a bully.

tRump can't handle direct confrontation to his actions. He gets pissed and, if he can, tries to leave the scene or, like this interview and the debate with Harris, he's stuck and has to do the whole thing or look like a baby. It's why his only push back is digital or when the other party can't rebuke him. He's a coward who, like most conservatives, can dish it out but can't take it. He relies on his base to do the tough guy stuff and uses his platform to rile them up.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›