this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
3105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 points 1 year ago

According to Hwang, the company now formerly known as Twitter did offer "an alternative handle with the history of the @x account" so that his original account, complete with its posts and followers, could live on and continue to be used.

What short, catchy username did Musk's company change Hwang's handle to? @x12345678998765.

You can't make this shit up. God damn!

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Elon Musk is a bully

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah why would they pay the "owner"? It's their platform they do whatever they want. What a dumb thing to complain about.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TIL if anyone carries anything valuable onto my property, it entitles me to take it from them

My property, my rules /s

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

TIL the original user of the "@x" account owned it and brought it to Twitter who then took it from him.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might be surprised to learn that you do in fact not "own" your Twitter handle and Twitter is not required to buy it off of you if they want it.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh really? Wow, maybe if I licked more boots it would make me smarter enough to "understand" this

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

People believing I'm licking Musk boots because I don't think they owe a user money for taking his account is just the funniest thing. Maybe go outside and touch some grass before posting. But wipe away that foam at your mouth before you do.

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would the bank give you your money, its their business and you gave it to them.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Contrary to Twitter banking is regulated and governed by actual laws. It's a completely different beast. Go ahead and google who the owner of the money in your account is and how that is regulated.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one is owed anything, but not compensating the original owner further erodes what little trust was left in the company. You wouldn't want to spend resources building a brand on a platform where your name can suddenly get snatched away at some billionaire's whim.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Absolutely true. But apparently the headlines for this event are all "he got no money for it!"

[–] Little8Lost@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the main problem with this is that with them doing it without asking or time to prepare all the people the guy knew where lost or have a problem finding him.
And the huy was seemingly not even a nobody but instead had a company so even more company contacts could get lost or customers wanting to directly reach out to him could sent private data to a 3 party (twitter) about confidential informations.

Secondly it says that the company can and will take over accounts when they have some reason, even if it is only the name.
That means the trust in the handle gets completly broken because it could be a twitter account in just a few seconds without warning.
So they have the power to take over an official governement or news account without warning and only leaving a reason. This is theoretical but if there is a news station with a handle like "xnews" i can really expect that it gets taken over in some time in the future.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I agree with all of this. I just think it's idiotic to complain that they didn't pay him. Twitter handles are not "owned" by the user and the platform can and will do with them whatever they like at any time.

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is this thing called decency. You might have heard of it.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah they even offered him some bullshit as compensation that they were not required to. Don't expect decency from a huge company like Twitter.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As much as this sucks, this person has no rights to their name and never did. Stop using the platform and giving it attention!

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha, me calling it dumb to think they'd be owed money is getting people super angry.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being downvoted is not indicative of voters' anger. It's simply showing they don't agree with you.

Pulling the victim card is revealing a shit-ton about you tho.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So what do users not agree to in my post but do with in this?

Also, what a fucking Reddit thing to do.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crying reddit croc tears in no way helps your cause.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I don't have a "cause". But I see that you have no answer.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate to say it because Fuck Elon, but this is just one of those things you sign away when you agree to the terms of service.

[–] muelltonne@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's still really petty - Elon is one of the richest guys on earth. Take the username, but send him a Tesla. Invite him to a SpaceX launch.

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Well you don't get rich by giving away 100k cars to everyone...

[–] popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt X has much money to spare to give to people considering how they hemorrhage money.

[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Clearly you don't realize how much a billion dollars really is then.

He could literally lose 99% of his wealth and still be islands buying rich.

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

From what i have read, most of his money is in the stock value of tesla. If other car makers take away teslas market share then elons wealth will soon follow, and right now he does not exactly do any of "his" companies any favours with his ego and business decisions.