I need a proper controversial sort option. I want to know where the juice is.
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)
Asklemmy
43707 readers
1475 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
What's wrong with the current controversial sort?
Gives me stuff from months ago.
Allow multiple groups per post (use them like tags). This would have some interesting implications regarding moderation and the handling of replies to the said post.
Having multiple identical posts in different groups with distributed replies doesn't feel ideal to me.
Having multiple identical posts in different groups with distributed replies doesnβt feel ideal to me.
I think this is actually a feature. You're essentially trying to centralize communities, but communities are decentralised just like instances.
Why do we have multiple Technology communities? Because some people might like the mods or the rules in the other community better or maybe you can't even access one of the communities because your instance is defederated from the instance with that community.
Just as one admin doesn't have monopoly on the Fediverse, no mod has monopoly on a community.
Multiple communities is a feature, not a bug.
I proposed an extension of the feature set. The current behaviour is still possible. You can use the added feature but you don't have to.
The issue for me:
The current landscape in lemmy has a lot of sparsely filled groups - I do not browse by group (filter by subscribed or all and sorted by new or hot).
In this view multiple identical posts with distributed replies are shown. This adds redundancy in the comments and reduces clarity.
Edit: The idea rises the question, how the ownership (or relation) of a post to the group and its replies should be handled. Using an x-post-like approach is just one idea.
I would like to see recommendations for communities based on my communities. It's not trivial to solve, but discoverability isn't great right now.
Problem here is also that your instance may not know about all communities from the instances you're connected to. This could probably also be improved.
Yes, that's what I mean by not trivial, a centralized system can do analysis like this a lot easier. But even on your own instance, they could find the N users with the most overlapping subscriptions and check which communities they follow to give you recommendations.
Recommendation algorithms are a big reason for the enshitification of other social media. You don't need to be connected to everything everywhere all at once. Enjoy your handful of small communities.
I don't want random posts to appear in my feed from communities I haven't subscribed to, but I want to have a feature that shows me suggestions for communities when I ask for it. That's a big difference. Right now it's (too) hard to find these communities.
Split NSFW into NSFW and NSFL.
It would probably be better to have a more general tag system and then NSFW and NSFL could just be examples of tags.
Although NSFW really serves the extra purpose of "18+" which is important to have for legal reasons.
Maybe a setting for each tag for whether it qualifies as NSFW? That way you could have multiple tags that would be filtered as NSFW for different classes of content, which could enable individual users to only filter one of the tags if they only want to avoid something specific.
I've made a post a few days ago. I'd argue we should make a proper distinction. Adult content and NSFW isn't the same thing. Currently everything from sex education to gore and death is the same category. I think it's really not. NSFW tags help so you can scroll through things in an open-plan office or while commuting. Porn is porn and gore is gore. I think we shouldn't oversimplify this but keep the nuances and have different categories. Also I'd like to not mix stuff like sex education which might be fine, and minors ask those questions all the time on Reddit with other things like fetish.
Sort by two filters at once (top this day, controversial this week, ...)
Controversial and others are literally useless, its always the same posts
Speed, a lot. Loading the profile for some reason takes forever for me, this "user not authenticated"