this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
148 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It isn't AI yet. They have just called it that. It was an illusion.

Now money is telling them the truth.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI is intelligent like a Hoverboard hovers.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Artificial intelligence is intelligent like artificial grass is grass. That's how the word artificial works. It just means man-made, says nothing about quality.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Careful saying that obvious thing, some people here will climb all the way up your butt about it. 🙄

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still consider it just another meta within chat. Its the next step from having the search summaries. It theoretically will aggregate more relevant links.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

theoretically will aggregate more relevant links.

Yep! I've seen real data scientists use LLMs for exactly that, and get great results!

I don't think we will see decent link search as a widespread success for another couple of years, though. Seems like most companies aren't willing to pay data scientists to build their (domain specific) models. Some of the code co-pilot tools are already quite good. But I bet Chevrolet of Watsonville won't get the next level of quality for a bit longer.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can I just put a comma between "AI" and "Google"?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

There is so much more between them ;-)

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is it "AI is hard" or "AI is not the best solution for this"?

[–] jherazob@fedia.io 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's "LLMs cannot do what the salesmen and CEOs say it can do by it's very nature"

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When rent seeking is glorified, there is an economic incentive for this parasitic behavior

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What you mean magic box can't do X, we need to milk it for revenue.

Now that I think about it giving AI rights might save humanity from corporations.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No surprise. LLM is to intelligence what a moped is to an airplane; both have wheels.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

I really hate the conflagration between AI and LLMs. We’re seeing a polishing of LLMs and they’re great for mimicking language, but they don’t “know” what they’re saying. We’re still quite a ways off from GenAI and have just started working on more specialized AI. But without some massive leaps in understanding logic and filtering out garbage it’s gonna be a while.