this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35258 readers
1269 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To me, it seems objectively easier to pull into a parking space forward and then back out of the space when you are ready to leave. You don't have to line up with the lines while driving backwards, and it's easier to keep from hitting other cars as well. So why back in? To me, the only advantage I can think of is that you can get out quicker, technically.

Edit: I do not need driving instruction, just wondered why. The reasoning.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sentiment is why I fully believe at least 50% of you shouldn't be allowed to operate a motor vehicle.

Which is more dangerous, backing into a parking spot, or backing into traffic?

For the love of God, if you drive a vehicle, figure it out.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I genuinely think the bar for a driver's licence should be raised to take 50% or more off the road.

Can't reverse park? Don't know where oil water and air goes on your car? Lack confidence in certain conditions? Here's a free bus pass.

[–] notapantsday@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

A lot of people don't even want to drive, but in a lot of places there's just no viable alternative.

[–] o_oli@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where are you from where those things are not part of a driving test?

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They make you check for water or air on a test or expect you to know? That would be novel in Canada.

[–] o_oli@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, in the UK it's part of the theory test, you have to know how and when to check air and fluid levels in order to get a licence.

[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Here in the states you need to know how to press the pedals and you're all set

[–] ialvoi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because you know what the situation is when you park, but you don't know what the situation will be when you leave.

[–] dub@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also cause its cool as fuck

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's actually kind of inconvenient to be behind someone doing this. It takes longer than pulling in and sometimes it's unexpected. Like I thought this one guy was turning but he was just lining up to back into a spot. He got mad when I pulled up behind him lol

[–] dub@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

sounds like your jealous of how cool they were

[–] brainrein@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

You need less space when you can park backwards. Considering parking in a lane parallel to the traffic.

[–] Elektrotechnik@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The steering axle is in the front. So if you back into a parking space, you turn around your back axle. This makes the alignment considerably easier, especially for tight parking spaces or crowded parking lots. If you wanted to park front first in that situation, you would have to correct several times because the turning radius is too big to get the car straight in front of the spot in one swoop.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbh cause its objectively not, backing up your point of rotation is the part that gets parked first. Gibes a lot more time to manuvure the front into place once the back is done

[–] cedeho@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

This. Absolutely. If the parking lot is small it might be impossible to park in forward - well, not really impossible but it is if you want to avoid Austin Powers like three point maneuvers.

[–] lwuy9v5@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Listen. Some of us are looking forward. To the Future. The future of pulling out of that parking spot. Not my fault if you stuck in the rear-view, my guy.

It's called Fancy Parking, sweetie. Look it up 💅

[–] IntentionallyAnon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Drive through method makes me happy

I know I’m weird

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Here's an intuitive reason, have you ever used a wheelbarrow? You'll notice that picking up a wheel barrow to push it is extremely nimble to spin it up around the wheel and dumping the contents precisely. Turn around and try instead to pull on it, and suddenly you can't make as sharp turns and maneuvers unless you uncomfortably shimmy your feet around. One fixed point of swivel with a long lever behaves differently being pushed than when being pulled. A car has a similar effect in place, driving backwards a car is more precise and maneuverable than going forward. Because the rear wheels act as pivot points and the front wheels have a long arm of leverage to more accurately direct the car, with tighter turn radius than when going forward. This is why experienced drivers agree that reversing into a parking spot is easier than pulling into it.