this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Asklemmy

43336 readers
776 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Clav64@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An elephant is the only mammal with 4 forward facing knees.

[โ€“] KzadBhat@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ok, what does that mean in terms of how an Elefant would wear some pairs of trousers?

[โ€“] Clav64@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The hill I'm prepared to die on on is that I think an elephant is the only mammal that could pull off wearing two pairs of cargo shorts at once.

[โ€“] KzadBhat@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

You're right, though the front would be perfect for some cargo dungarees.

[โ€“] hansl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

7% of all homosapien to have ever lived are alive today.

[โ€“] stratoscaster@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If this percentage trending up or down?

[โ€“] hansl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

~~Up as population grows and down as it shrinks.~~

Apparently Iโ€™m wrong.

[โ€“] crystal@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

That's not true. If the population grows only a little, say one more person each year, the relative amount shrinks.

[โ€“] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The USA is not a true democracy in the academic sense of the word.

[โ€“] seapat@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Could you elaborate?

[โ€“] supersane@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] exi@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I was about to argue with you but the dictionary says you are right.

Take my upvote.

[โ€“] bstix@feddit.dk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Gnubeutel@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

That would be a diameter of about 800 km. Don't they have multiple centers that could be called towns? With churches, administration and schools? They just can't be bothered to split it up.

[โ€“] Huffkin@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oxford University is older than the Aztec empire.

Oxford University founded in 1326, Aztec empire ~1428-1521

[โ€“] Gnubeutel@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Wait, you're saying that the Aztec empire was just 64 years old when Columbus discovered America and ships with conquistadors followed to butcher and enslave everyone?

[โ€“] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The can opener was invented 30 years after the can.

[โ€“] Borovicka@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, wouldn't it be weird if it was the other way around?

"Yooo, check this out, I made a new invention, it's called a can opener!"
What does it do?
"idk"

[โ€“] Scrath@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The elevator shaft was invented before the elevator. Tom Scott made a video about that

[โ€“] banana_tree@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've noticed Americans tend to be surprised that Europe is bigger than the US

[โ€“] spechter@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an European I'm also surprised that the US' vertical Expansion is only around twice that of France.

[โ€“] cyberic@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean by vertical expansion?

[โ€“] Aiyub@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Not the one who said it, but it would imply distance north to south

[โ€“] 1019throw@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The northern most part of Brazil is closer to Canada than it is to the southern most part of Brazil.

[โ€“] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] nigh7y@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Kissaki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Bigger than the earth. That image surely must be right.

[โ€“] freundTech@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Every Rubik's Cube, no matter how scrambled, can be solved in at most 20 rotations.

[โ€“] swnt@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Oh, I have two good ones:

  1. Nuclear power causes less deaths (per energy unit produced) than wind (source)

  2. You get less radiation when living near a nuclear power plant, than if that nuclear plant hadn't been there.

To explain the second: A major misconception is, that nuclear power plants are dangerous due to their radiation. No they aren't. The effect of radiation from the rocks in the ground and the surroundings is on average 50x more than what you get from the nuclear power plant and it's fuel cells. (source). Our body is very well capable of dealing with the constant background radiation all the time (e.g. DNA repairs). Near a power plant, the massive amounts of isolation and concrete will inhibit any background radiation coming from rocks from that direction to you. This means, that you'll actually get slightly less radiation, because the nuclear plant is there.

Regarding the dangers of nuclear disasters. To this day, it's been very hard to find out, if at all any people have even died to Fukushima radiation (ans not other sources such as tsunami/earthquake/etc.) Nuclear radiation causes much more problems by being an emotionally triggering viral meme spreading between people and hindering it's productive use and by distracting from the ironic fact, that the coal burned in coal power plants spew much more radiation into the atmosphere than nuclear power plants themselves. (source)

[โ€“] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nuclear power is actually the cleanest way to produce energy. The waste from replacing solar panels and windmills (which have a service life only three to five years) is actually more of a problem than the waste from spent fuel rods. Plus environmental impacts from fuel rod production are less than solar panel and windmill production. The problem with nuclear energy happens when things go wrong. It would have to be absolutely accident free. It never has been and never will be.

Though they're on the right track with nuclear power. Fusion would be ideal, runs on seawater (fuses deuterium/tritium) and if there's a problem you simply shut off the fuel. Problem is insurmountable engineering issues, we just don't have tech for it yet (need anti-gravity). They've been working on it for many decades and progress has been painfully slow.

[โ€“] swnt@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Even when things go wrong, it's not as bad as with the other classic fossile energy sources. Exactly this calculation is included in the world in data source on deaths per kWh which I linked.

When we have car accidents normalised, massive climate change, air pollution from fossile fuels, then even the occasional nuclear accident isn't really a problem.

The problem is, that these accidents get much more attention than they deserve given how many deaths are caused by fossile fuels. When calibrating for deaths, fossile fuels should get around 100x the attention

[โ€“] SeaJ@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Windmills last much longer than five years. They generally last 20-25. Wherever you heard that bullshit number from, ignore all the other info you got from them.

Not only windmills, but also every for of alternative energy production.

[โ€“] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[โ€“] swnt@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Haha, that's a nice explanation

[โ€“] BlackRose@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] swnt@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

What are you trying to say by linking this article?

I mean, it even says that it was a mechanical issue - and the radiation danger was low. And even then, it's just a single person. Looking at the bigger picture, the numbers game favors nuclear+wind+solar over fossile.

[โ€“] sweetviolentblush@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Today I learned the president of the Screen Actors Guild is The Nanny (Fran Dresher)

[โ€“] EunieIsTheBus@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Hey me too!

[โ€“] julianh@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Your car keys have better range if you press them to your head, since your skull will act as an antenna. It sounds like some made up pseudoscience that would never work in practice or have a negligible effect, but it actually works.

Edit: idk if it's actually because your skull acts as an antenna, although that's what I've heard. I looked it up and it seems like it's your head acting as a reasonance chamber. Since your body is conductive, your head can bounce and amplify the radio signal.

[โ€“] Cybermass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is absolutely no way this is true. I need to see some evidence to believe this. (I work as a wireless technician)

[โ€“] hardypart@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's true, but not because your skull acts like an antenna. It's because the signal is being reflected by the skull. You can actually just try it out, the range of your car keys will extend when you hold them to your chin.

[โ€“] Cybermass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt enough signal reflect of off your very radio wave observing skull to make much of a difference at all, it's most likely a placebo effect and the real reason it extends the range is because you are holding the key fob higher, so it has a better LOS with less obstructions, and it has a better chance to bounce waves off of the very reflective concrete on the ground up to the sensor of your car.

Organic materials are absolute crap at reflecting wireless signals, they are much better at absorbing and scattering them.

[โ€“] hardypart@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Try it out, for real! The effect is too strong for being a placebo.

[โ€“] zephyr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your skull acts as an antenna

How?

[โ€“] pturn1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The tinfoil hat you're wearing amplifies the signal!