this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4235 readers
1322 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Had an old landlord keep my deposit when I moved out just because they could. We left the apartment absolutely spotless and never damaged anything. In fact, we added value by fixing a couple small things. Didn’t matter.

Fuck landlords.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yup, I'm at the point where I gave up on cleaning at all because I get screwed every single time.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We wet-vacuumed the carpets and everything. We were pissed. Never had any issues with the landlord and were always good tenants. They just decided they liked money over everything else.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

They know they can get away with it and almost nobody will take them to small claims court.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Double property taxes on owners, but give back a property tax credit on owner-occupants, so that the effective tax rate on owner occupants falls, and the only people paying the doubled tax rate are investors.

Statutorily increase the tax rate and credit when owner occupancy is below 80%, and reduce the tax rate and credit when owner occupancy rises above 90%.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Wouldn't landlords simply pass those costs onto their renters?

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

No because not all landlords are capitalized equally. A new investor with a huge mortgage would. An old landlord with paid off property wouldn't. Unless they collude.

[–] Maddier1993@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Introduce rent control

[–] fishpen0@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When my city raised property taxes, rents went up across the board.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Being a landlord is supposed to be a job though. They're supposed to maintain the property and handle property related disputes between the tenant and the community. The problem is landlords aren't held to their obligations and are allowed to treat it as a passive investment. Liability for landlords and their property managers needs to be increased. Require a licence for landlording that can be revoked.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Imagine believing this.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So owning a fleet of rental cars is being a social parasite and not a job?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago
[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

"Owning things" is not a job, correct. Making a living owning property is not a service to society.

Doing the labour to repair property is a service. Doing the filing to keep records of usage and repair is a service. Taking a cut because your name is on a deed? That's just stealing from the people who did the work.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

No, because people won't die without affordable rental cars.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone -1 points 6 months ago

I have to agree with those others who suggest that banning landlords is not the way to go.

However, the power dynamics should be significantly shifted. And if those shifts mean some landlords decide to exit the market? So be it.

  1. Tenants should not be able to be evicted for any reason other than: damaging the property, being significantly (maybe 6 months?) behind on rent, the owner or an immediate family member wants to move in, significant renovations are needed (with strong enforcement to ensure these last two are actually done, and not used as a fake excuse). No ability to use evictions as a reprisal for complaining about the conditions.
  2. Tenants should be entitled to treat the place basically as their own. That means any minor reversible modification should be permitted, including painting and hanging up photos.
  3. No restrictions on pets other than those which would normally come with local ordinances and animal welfare laws.
  4. Rental inspections every 3 months is absurd. Maybe the first after 3 months, then 6 months, then annually after that at best.
  5. Strict rules about landlords being required to maintain the property to a comfortable condition. Harsh penalties if they fail to do so, as well as the ability for the tenant to get the work done themselves and make the landlord pay for it, if the landlord does not get it done in a reasonable time.

And tangentially, to prevent property owners just leaving their homes without a long-term tenant: significantly increased rates/taxes for homes that are unoccupied long-term, or which are used for short-term accommodation (e.g. Airbnb). Additionally, state-owned housing with highly affordable pricing should make up a substantial portion of the market, on the order of 30%. This provides a pretty hard floor below which privately-owned housing cannot fall, because people should be reasonably able to say "this place isn't good enough, I'll move".

If a property owner is willing to deal with the fact that a home's first and foremost purpose should be to provide a safe and secure place for a person to live, then I have no problem with them profiting.