this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

28904 readers
5 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UniversalHatred@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Spez personally banned me for harasent because I reported a child porn seller

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, Spez was a mod of /r/jailbait before advertisers made them take it down....

[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, really? Not that I'm actually surprised but it's almost to perfect...

[–] tetha@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Other claims say that this was from a time when you could just add mods to your sub without requiring their consent, though.

[–] c0mpufreak@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Really curious to see how long the more popular subreddits will remain private. Surely the admin won't just turn them public again without having any mods, right? I kinda would love to see that dumpster fire.

[–] Zeus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

somebody else pointed this out, but it's honestly bizarre he's going in on the "we aren't making any money" ploy in preparation for the ipo

what's the pitch to the investors? "please by shares in this unprofitable company, in the hope that we can become profitable by pissing off our userbase"?

[–] MachineTeaching@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

It's not actually about the money in that sense. Don't be fooled.

No, they want to kick out third party apps because that cuts costs and the first party app is way better for pushing ads onto users. That's the real investor pitch, they just aren't saying it out loud.

If it was about being profitable, why charge such outrageous prices?

If it's about covering costs created by these apps, why suddenly drop such a huge change on them with an timeframe that can't possibly be met? Why don't they work together with app developers, communicate things well ahead of time and give them some leeway when necessary?

They just want to kill third party apps without outright saying it and the easiest way to do that is to charge costs they can't pay.

[–] TeaHands@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"We're not afraid to make the tough decisions and purposefully alienate our longest-standing users, the ones who know about things like adblock and try to hold us accountable to things we said a decade ago. Please give us money for this new sleeker userbase without any of those pesky olds."

[–] branchial@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Completely agree. They want a tiktok or Instagram clone except for link aggregation. Happy people mindlessly scrolling and eliciting predictable reactions and emotions.

Cats -> πŸ₯° News -> πŸ€” Injustice -> 😑 Helping others -> πŸ€— Cool gadgets -> 🀯

No thinking just liking

[–] Steamymoomilk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WE should blackout for longer, i own a very small subreddit, but 2 days is not enough!! im not backing down tomorrow, i ask over subs do the same. lets stick it to reddit

[–] llii@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I won't go back, with all the changes in the last few years. Reddit isn't moving in a direction I like.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They really should have just found out what the 3rd party apps -COULD PAY-. If it covered the cost of their usage and there was some profit on the top, it would at least bring in some money. Based on what I read by the Apollo dev, there was back and forth communication about pricing for a while until he broke the news.

It astounds me that they chose to cut them off entirely by offering impossible pricing. Isn't some money better than no money?

[–] Rhabuko@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's because the planned IPO. Allowing third party apps, that are better designed, show no ads and don't collect the same amount of telemetry data (seriously the official app spies constantly for user data), doesn't look good in the eyes of potential investors.

[–] ultimate_question@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Others have speculated that the API pricing model is built around customers who want to use the data for AI training, not customers who want to build apps for public use. The $20M price tag is what they're hoping a mega corp will pay for data access and don't care about anyone who can't afford that much. Some money is better than no money, but for a lot of people the "chance" at BIG money is better than some money lol

[–] smithy46@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If this is the case, I don’t understand why they wouldn’t just separate into tiers, where mass data usage to feed into a language model is priced differently than people legitimately using and contributing content to the site.

[–] Bautznersenf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when a bunch of MBAs are detached from the product they're working on.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Captain of the Titanic: "we're sticking to our course, despite the iceberg being dead ahead"

[–] amki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Funny thing if they had done that and the iceberg hit frontally like the engineers planned for it would probably not have sunken the ship.

What the engineers didn't foresee was an iceberg strafing the side and cutting open too many sections for the ship to stay afloat.

[–] Scheissberg@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I really can't wait to see what's the fallout of Reddit going dark. Does the community really wield the power? Or does Reddit have another ace up its sleeve?

[–] massive5337@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This kind of protest is meaningless, going back online after 48 hours? It's just a way for communities to feel good about themselves. The best way to protest is to delete the account / subreddit going offline indefinitely (although I doubt the effectiveness of this)

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I think a blackout has a much higher impact than deleting accounts.

There are so many users nobody notices when a few disappear. But when a subreddit goes dark it's most certainly noticeable.

It's evident by now Reddit management doesn't care. Two days raise awareness amongst users. Maybe the two days won't be the last for many subreddits or people. And I'm sure more people became more aware, or thought more about the situation and alternatives than without a two day blackout.

[–] yankeebobo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The only long term solution is improving our product, and in the short term we have a few upcoming critical mod tool launches we need to nail.

Yeah okay

Kill other apps before yours is on par (will it ever happen) isn't improving the product.

[–] Hrag@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Money rules everything around me" -The CEO of Reddit

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Too bad higher prices doesn't necessarily mean more money.

[–] dminus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find it funny that a 3rd party app can be "profitable" but reddit cant be profitable without alienating a sizeable chunk of their userbase.

Reddit has increasingly become a cesspit of racism and bigotry anyways, and I find Im going there less and less.

I need to get used to how lemmy works and find my 3d printing people here.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

but reddit cant be profitable without alienating a sizeable chunk of their userbase

Do those API prices make Reddit profitable? I highly doubt it.

I'd never repeat their claims as if they were true. It's just bullshit reasoning. Mismanagement.

[–] Nogami@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just migrated here from reddit. Don't plan on going back. That platform is done.

[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean... the discussion is reddit, isn't it?

If I wanted to scroll mindlessly through the flea market of the internet, I'd open Mastodon. I often do, but, reddit is, er... was the community. The community is reddit. The memes, the jokes, the little phrases. They don't own any of that.

[–] theDuesentrieb@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

This Reddit board thinks they can fence people in but don't see that al of what they are is build by people that likely just go elsewhere if they're continually treated like shit