this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
578 points (97.8% liked)

YUROP

2281 readers
150 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Topics that should not be discussed here:

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 66 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've seen a lot of individuals like this in my life.... "I don't want to play, so the game is over". No dude, you're welcome to not participate, but you're not the life of this group.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's also anoying when the oposite happens. You can't join? Then we will cancel. Just fkin do it. You don't need me every time.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Isn't it beatiful how none of us do or could ever matter? But why does orange man get to have such influence. No one should matter in this world, that's the point!

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We (the west) helped them become who they are. We relocated all our production there because they were cheap and didn't mind throwing a bunch of poor people into the grinder. Arguably, the fastest and most efficient way for them to get out from under our thumb was authoritarian rule. Democratic rule would've been torpedoed by the US or one of its European vassals in favour of an authoritarian one we installed.

The world could've looked very different had the US not meddled in a lot of countries. Here's an entire list that probably has about 70 countries on it.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

had the US not meddled in a lot of countries

Hold on a sec, you can't get off the hook that easy, Europe

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Democratic rule would've been torpedoed by the US or one of its European vassals in favour of an authoritarian one we installed.

Literally the sentence above it

[–] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sentence still makes it sound like you think the US has been unilaterally directing western colonialism, but European nations have independently taken the initiative on that quite a bit

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

It's ridiculing the lack of agency European countries chose to have when being pulled into various wars and missions with the US. The comment additionally starts off with "We (the west)". If Europe doesn't belong to "the west", then where do they belong to?

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That sentence takes away agency from those European "vassals". The British and French empires still exist to this day. They conduct their own foreign policy and are in charge of their own internal security and territorial integrity.

The person you're responding to is absolutely right.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

Funny how you are able to use hyperbole without recognising it yourself.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, no - they definitely don't still exist. Their marks are still left on the places they once subjugated, sure, but they definitely do not exist anymore.

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tell that to northern Ireland, Scotland, Gibraltar, French Guiana or Polynesia.

Both countries still have overseas territories all over the world. It doesn't matter how hard you, they or anyone else tries to legitimize those colonies, that's still what they are.

Why were the French using the Polynesian islands as nuclear testing grounds up through 1996? Would the French government be so lax with testing in their own country? No - that's why they did it in a colony with 200,000 brown people instead.

[–] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sadly a better partner than the USA currently.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No. Just because the US has become worse than before and China didn't, even if the US closed in on how bad China is, that doesn't make China better than the US. More reliable, yes, but not better.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Reliability is a big part of a good trading partner. Also helps if you can be reasoned with.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Cheap (slave) labor is also good for trade I guess. And an authoritarian regime is nice for stability.

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you talking about USA or China?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Doesn't matter.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

To be fair, dictatorships are brittle, they are 100% stable up until suddenly they collapse.

Just look at assad.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

China seems to be lawful neutral. Much easier to deal with than USA's current chaotic evil.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Compared to USA, yes. Their own logic and code they follow.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Doesn't help that the stupid simple DnD system can't possibly give a decent explanation of the differences between the USA and China.

But yes, the USA is currently more threatening towards Europe and Canada than China is. The USA is also significantly more chaotic/unpredictable/unreasonable/insane.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On which points do you think the current USA government is better than China's one?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems so since you disagreed with my initial comment.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What I say is that we shouldn't trade extensively neither with China nor the US. Fuck China, fuck the US.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In the 80s, 90s and early 00s the left was against globalism, so it's extremely weird to see things being reversed...

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“The left” is not a monolith.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The left was very much all anti globalization. Globalization was implemented by the likes of Thatcher and Reagan to save on salaries, the left was pro workers.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And now globalism is generally more good than bad, isolationism isn't going to fix anything. Seems perfectly rational for left wing people to change their view when circumstances change.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More good than bad? Manufacturing jobs for people who don't pursue higher education have disappeared from the first world leading to the slow death of the middle class, third world countries see their people becoming slaves that make products they'll never be able to afford in order to feed the Western world all the things it wants without having to pay the labor required to make it, Africa can't get out of the shit it's in because its agriculture isn't based on feeding itself...

Yeah, globalism is awesome if you're an office worker with university level education and you like to buy shit.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Globalism is good for consumerism.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For the consumerism of a small minority by exploiting a majority if you look on a global scale

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago
[–] phneutral 7 points 1 week ago

„Hoch die Internationale Solidarität!“ (Cheers to international solidarity)

[–] vegantomato@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fyi, China is not in that crowd. China is at least as bad as the US. It just knows it can't afford to pull the same stunts. They are still an imperialistic shithole.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Honestly in what way would China be considered better?

They check all the boxes:

  • Malicious Trade and Finance shenanigans
  • Dictatorship
  • Militant Expansionists
  • Constant Psyops
  • Supporting horrible militant factions across the globe
  • Run by racial supremacists
  • Cracks down on non-official religions
  • Massive polluters (used to have the excuse of low emissions per capita until they started reversing policies meant to limit capita)

Every bad thing you can say about the USA goes for China and then some.

[–] shaserlark@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah I guess we’re gonna get bombarded more with Chinese propaganda soon as they’ll try to replace the US as our new daddy

[–] EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

One of those things, does not belong with the others lol.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The "Christians" who take the Bible literally actually do believe that globalism is evil. But that's what happens when your religious texts were written first by nomads, then by a civilization that regularly got conquered, and finally a cult that was persecuted by the Romans.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, the "Christians" who oppose trade clearly have never even read the Bible, or even just the New Testament. Jesus spent a lot of time telling people to love the stranger, the traveler, and the alien. To treat a foreigner in your land as kindly as you would your brother. Modern Republicans have completely abandoned the teaching of the actual historical Jesus.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

That's now considered socialist and/or weak by these people. Not my words, they've says this to their own pastors. They're not Christians in anything but name and self-delusionment.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Yay! Canada's included in the joke!

load more comments
view more: next ›