this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
486 points (83.1% liked)

Humor

8255 readers
6 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules


Read Full Rules Here!


Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.


Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!


Rule 3: No spamming!


Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.


Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.


Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.


Please report any violation of rules!


Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.


We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ButteryNickel@lemmy.wtf 126 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] rowdyrockets@lemm.ee 113 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Are we really turning to AI to create a few 3D shapes and a rock wall with a hole in it?

I get the joke - it’s funny even. But seriously I would rather see a crude stick drawing from someone with no artistic talent than this soulless slop.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 181 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Someone made a better version back in 2021 as well.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

This is a million times better than that Ai slop

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's so fucking common these days. I keep seeing it on things I want to like, but I refuse to encourage the behavior.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

how did you recognise it? I only managed to after zooming in to see the wobble in the text

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Personally? Vibes. Specifically, it feels very... uniform. Like, a human artist good enough to draw like that would be better at composition, I think?

More practically, even the newer ones struggle with specific shapes; look at the arch, no human would draw that weird hybrid of an arch and a... semi-donut?

Older models struggle with lining stuff up and keeping things straight over long distances. The latest ones struggle with constant curvatures.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah it's funny how something on a "vibes" level just made me feel like me something was off and made me look into it closer. I worry that one day I won't have that weird feeling anymore.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

The obvious one to me was the two pyramid triangle things.

The block box thing only comes with one.

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Sizes are off, especially the circle wouldn't fit.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This is the new comic style being spammed everywhere. I think the most telling thing is that literally everything has this paper texture in a digital drawing, except the speech bubble, also this font is very specific to them.

It is getting harder spotting AI, but very doable yet.

Agreed, but it's all downhill from here. When AI generated content is completely indistinguishable from human, things will

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 63 points 1 week ago (17 children)

I'm not an anti-AI absolutist, but for environmental reasons we should significantly cut down on the use of AI, especially for unnecessary things such as memes.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My GPU generates stuff in seconds that would take hours to make, once the model is trained it's pretty much no energy to use it.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

Okay fair enough.

I mean if people use a self-hosted model on their own GPU that's really their prerogative how they choose to use their GPU and the energy it uses.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just got the hardcopy of this novel about a week ago and it's amazing.

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m oblivious. What novel is this?

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Other commenter got the title. The artist is Junji Ito, and he has a lot of works as equally creepy as this one. Uzumaki might be the most popular one

[–] Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you’re curious they made uzumaki into an anime.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'll be honest, I'm immediately apprehensive that they messed it up. Is it good? Quick Google search says Ito was involved so that's a relief

[–] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It was heavily criticized due to the severe drop in animation quality after the first episode. It's like they spent 95% of the budget in episode 1, which got everybody hyped (and it is legitimately good), and then left the rest of the budget to pay a couple of overworked interns to haphazardly put together the rest of the animation.

The events of the story are all there, and the art style is the closest you can probably get to the original, but it does fail to capture a lot of the magic of the manga due to shoddy animation. I wouldn't recommend it, personally.

[–] Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

I found it really creepy! I hadn’t read uzumaki beforehand, I did afterwards and enjoyed both. It might be a bit of an off-putting style, but it’s staying true to the art style of ito.

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Thank you, both! Already deeply engrossed in it.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

The Enigma of Amigara Fault

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

That's not the only meme it's referencing, OP.

DRRR DRRR

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

This is far side for millennials and i like it lol

Edit: Oh god it's AI trash. Sad

Report it and hopefully they'll take it down.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In this case it's easy: There's multiple places where the cross-hatching doesn't make sense stroke-wise. The stippling is weird and overdone, can you imagine a human moving their pen like that? Why spend like 99% of the work on what's, thematically, negative space? ...that's because the AI has trouble understanding that cross-hatching is lines, and that dithering isn't stippling, it confuses an art style with scans of photographs printed in newspapers.

A human also wouldn't have gotten the shape of the arch and even more so pyramid wrong.

GTFO here with "soulless" that's the AI critique equivalent of "I can tell by the pixels". Of course this shit doesn't have soul it's, thematically, a fucking technical drawing. Sibs be saying "Plato was an AI, here, his drawing of the solids, they lack soul". You ever seen a dodecahedron with soul?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Every time someone vouches for ai to make “art” all i hear is “AI sets you free.” Not good, indeed very odd stuff.

load more comments
view more: next ›