this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
-59 points (24.3% liked)

US Authoritarianism

702 readers
324 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 6 months ago
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For the idiots who don't know that prosecutors don't impose sentences, judges do?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Has to do with bad crime lab evidence:

https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article233375207.html

"While the San Francisco Police Department was responsible for running the lab, not Harris’s district attorney office, a court ruled in 2010 that the district attorney’s office violated defendants’ constitutional rights by not disclosing what it knew about the tainted drug evidence.

Judge Anne-Christine Masullo wrote in her decision that prosecutors “at the highest levels of the district attorney’s office knew that Madden was not a dependable witness at trial and that there were serious concerns regarding the crime lab.”

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Right, which are controlled by ", not the prosecutor".

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The prosecutor chooses which expert witnesses and evidence to use in court, Harris knew this witness and evidence were suspect, used them anyway to get convictions, and maintained the suspect evidence to keep people imprisoned when they should have been released.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The judge determines what evidence is allowed in court and not allowed.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, and the DA determines what to bring to the judge. Harris knew the witness and evidence was comprimised and brought it anyway to get the conviction. Post conviction, she fought exculpatory evidence that would have seen people freed.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's no there there. Get over it buddy.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

California court sure didn't agree:

"a court ruled in 2010 that the district attorney’s office violated defendants’ constitutional rights by not disclosing what it knew about the tainted drug evidence. "

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So what does the prosecutor do then? They just hang out and try to help people? lmao.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They are the lawyer who brings the states case. LMAO

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right, which are controlled by “, not the prosecutor”.

"It was the SS that ran the death camps, not us - besides, we were just doing our job!" - quite a few Gestapo boys at the end of WW2, probably.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your point is irrelevant so that was the nicest reply I could think of.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's only "irrelevant" to fascism sympathizers - so good job outing yourself.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or anyone with a brain who doesn't equate a functioning legal system to the Nazis. Get lost idiot.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Oh, look... a liberal with a dangerously cartoonish understanding of fascism.

Gee, Clyde - didn't you know that "Law & Order" isn't just a tv show that blatantly miseducated you about the function and role of police in the liberal nation state, but also the rallying cry of all fascist states?

You make it so easy for the fascists, don't you, liberal? They just have to package it right, and you'll acquiesce without even a whimper - just like liberals always have, eh?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What a garbage defense. The point is that she actively supported locking up minorities and collaborated with private prisons to profit off prisoners. If you want to blame all that on "judges", then who's the real idiot?

The whole point of the injustice system is dividing up all the evil so no single person feels responsible and no single person can be held accountable. But it will never actually absolve prosecutors of their prosecutions.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Stay angry idiot.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So, you'd rather have convicted felon Donald Trump leading the country instead?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'd rather have a normal, decent person than these vampire politicians.

Or better yet I would rather not be violently controlled by a fundamentally corrupt and destructive state.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nobody here is going to disagree with you on that. However the choice before us is Harris or trump. Any other voting decision besides Harris is a vote for trump.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Forget about it.

Liberals don't care - they have their "good cop" (literally a pig), and they will happily go to sleep after November while Harris and the dems fertilizes the ground further for the fascists.

[–] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Hey, I would suggest bouncing from lemmy.world. It's heavily populated by neoliberals so posts like this aren't going to go over well.