this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
12 points (92.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9604 readers
885 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IanAtCambio@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This would just become a 100 apartment buildings.

[–] rexxit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. People who advocate for densification are basically advocating for everywhere to be Amsterdam or NYC with continuous human habitation and maybe small concessions in the form of city parks (a joke compared to real natural areas, IMO).

I'm not sure if they're aware that this will be the logical conclusion of those policies.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather have a few cities and a lot of unspoilt nature than no cities and no nature, just suburban sprawl everywhere

[–] rexxit@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

How about nice green suburbs with single family homes and a lot fewer people?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if that much housing is needed then the idea of not providing it is kind of.. monstrous? evil?

[–] kier@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah mate, there should be laws to how much people can live in some area. It's inhumane to compress so many people in one place. I don't want every city to be Hong Kong.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

well i'm certainly glad you have no legislative power because you sound pretty selfish.