this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59166 readers
2154 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple users bash new iPhone 15: ‘Innovation died with Steve Jobs’::Smart phone fans are griping about Apple's new devices since the arguably anti-climactic announcement of the forthcoming iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus on Tuesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Steve Jobs didn't innovate a thing in his life. Apple has always been stealing tech and pretending that they created it.

Now with this new version, they don't even have much anything to steal. At best, they pretended that the EU didn't force them to adopt USB 3 and boast how much faster it is than Lightning port.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their Laptop Chips are in fact leading technology. Intel and AMD are far behind in Performance/Power used

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're correct, but it's important to note that the M chips are very expensive to produce, and abandoning x86 means literally all the software iOS and OSX uses needs to be rewritten (or translated via Rosetta). It's a huge project with tons of risks and massive costs. Apple can do this because they're pretty much completely vertically integrated at this point, and control their ecosystem completely. If amd independently released some new non compatible architecture that was dramatically faster, it'd likely be dead in the water.

Intel learned this lesson the hard way during the Itanic days. AMD took the relatively safer approach when they released amd64.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct. I wish there were open source chips in this category. Not that anyone could afford to produce it, but I believe Software for a chip with a new instruction set would be more adapted if you could look everything up

[–] sndrtj@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

RISC-V is open source. Lots of boards are moving to RISC-V.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Well it seems I am not up to day on the topic. This is great

[–] Xia@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah because the first iPhone wasn’t a Revolution,

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It was not revolutionary in the sense of technology, it was revolutionary in the sense of getting the general public to understand and accept the idea of a smartphone.

EDIT: Not to say it's still necessary. I mostly stick to the iPhone because I don't want to repurchase all the apps I already purchased, some for a significant amount, if I have to replace my phone. If that becomes moot one day, like if iPhones get to the point that they're unusable or somehow Apple goes under, I'll switch.

[–] Niiru@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

So they had "innovative marketing", ok.