this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59612 readers
3232 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Question to anyone who might know more: would sodium based batteries be better than lithium ones for the environment, in terms of recycling or disposing of it?

In case they are indeed better, would they be better because it's better to use less lithium in general (so if you use more sodium based ones, you use less lithium) or would they be also better because their own disposal is "nicer" (as in less toxic) for the environment?

[โ€“] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Sodium is pretty much everywhere and it's often a waste product of other activities. So in terms of damage through mining, sodium should be much better. Recycling sodium will likely never be worth it, so there's a danger that toxic compounds will end up in the environment. Lithium, it's much more likely to be recycled because it's more expensive. But that again has an environmental impact. In short, there is no definitive answer. It all depends on how well mining, production and disposal are regulated and supervised.