this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8488 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The French government issued a decree Tuesday banning the term "steak" on the label of vegetarian products, saying it was reserved for meat alone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What a strange thing to be pedantic about

[–] V0lD@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It isn't

You don't want to be tricked into eating something else than you intended. Even ignoring the whole value of eating meat argument, there is an allergy problem in play

And, I've noticed that vegetarian products are being hidden more and more insidiously over the years. It's intentionally misleading and potentially harmful

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No one ever bought vegan steak thinking it was meat. And calling it a vegan steak perfectly explains what kind of product you're looking at.

[–] V0lD@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's just false. I've seen multiple people including myself and my so make that mistake multiple times.

Maybe it's packaged more clearly where you're from, but over here the difference is quite subtle

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You buy steak without caring from what animal but get triggered if it's not meat?

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nice assumption. I can tell a pork steak from eg. a beef one by looking at it. If it's sold as steak and doesn't say something like marinated, I am safe to assume that there is no list of ingredients to check. This is true in Australia and Europe supermarkets. Just a fucking piece of meat. 3 seconds decision while you move on with your shopping.

A meatless product made to look like a beef steak can easily look like a beef steak. So no, until yesterday you didn't need a microscope to 'care' what animal it was you were buying. Now I need to make sure that it's actual fucking meat. That's where making mislabelling illegal does help.

I'd love to see the reaction of the vegans if someone was sneaking in meat or eggs in products labelled as vegan.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're only assuming that those minced meat is beef when you pick it. It's pretty dumb running through the world with closed eyes and demanding everyone to counteract your shortcoming. I'm sure youre able to read.

I'd love to see the reaction of the vegans if someone was sneaking in meat or eggs in products labelled as vegan.

Lol what's wrong with your mind do you really think vegetables somehow hurt you?

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No I love vegetables, it's just that I like to choose and I hate processed foods. Most important I like to know what I am buying and stop customer shaming, I shouldn't need to read the fine print because some scanmers are trying to sell shit for something else.

Good follow-up though with your question about vegetables, I go through the veggie aisle and grab a head of broccoli. Am I allowed to assume it's a fucking broccoli or do I need to read the fine print too? How would vegetarians/vegans (or anyone really) feel if the head of broccoli was plunged in pig fat and sold just as broccoli. And everyone on lemmy was just 'get over it it's still broccoli, it's a word you don't own it' and some other bullshit about shortcomings.

The European union has some pretty strong regulations around food and mislabelling. Sorry doesn't work that way, you can't blame a customer for not reading the fine printing.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yea the EU allows to call plant based products steak lol. Because its defined as a piece of fried edible. And broccoli is just broccoli, sonce ever. If you cover it in fat it's "broccoli with fat".

You can't blame others for you not being able to think or read

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not just me, also a whole fucking coutry that just legislated about it and more countries will follow.

It's a new thing, it takes time. I and its not just about me not being able to read, it's all the customers that will be mislead and sold processed food instead of, you know, a steak. That some people don't Sure it is allowed, this is a while new thing, give time to regulators to catch up, as France is doing.

Also, Oxford dictionary has four definitions for steak, none of them is that spew of words that you just made up to fit your narrative:

  1. a thick slice of good quality beef
  2. a thick slice of any type of meat
  3. beef that is not of the best quality, often sold in small pieces and used in pies, stews, etc.
  4. a large thick piece of fish
[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

English isn't eveb any EU member's language lol who cares about oxford.

And do you really think anything without a transparent packaging would be unprocessed? To be precise, every food in a supermarket beside raw vegetables/fruits is processed. Even meat. You're confused and living an illusion

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

English not a eu member language uh? How about first you think about which countries on the continent speak what language, then which ones are members, then you go and read the Wikipedia page about it and we pretend this conversation never happened and noone will hold it against you not even the stupid part about packaging means processed and me being the one confused here

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well oxford isn't eu you pathetic confused and whiny dumb wannabe boomer lord lol

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But, but, but.. let me deflect!

Still positive English is not a language of the eu? Really really really?

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I already know that you're a psychopath no need to proof

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You are embarrassing yourself please stop

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

How? And why or how do you hallucinate I'd do something because some confused huge baby tells me so lol

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Oh we're good at this. In the whole EU it's not allowed to print 'milk' or 'cheese' on something that doesn't contain actual animal's milk. Want to sell soy milk? Ok but don't call it that way...

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sorry you are saying you can't call something that is not cheese 'cheese'? Preposterous.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

Well to be precise you're not allowed to label any agricultural product cheese that wasn't made of milk.

There are only some exceptions for traditional things like Leberkäse

[–] muelltonne@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I can tell you a little about how Germany does this and I think the rest of the EU & France should be similar. There is a government body defining what specific foods are and if your food doesn't match that, you can't name it like the food in question. And that does make sense - butter has to be made from milk and not some palm oil mixed together by shady businesses and milk has to come from an animal and can't be water & white paint.

This does make sense and really protects the consumer. It does - however - really run into problems when dealing with those vegetarian meat replacements. It would make sense to sell a "vegetarian ham", but ham has an exact, legal definition and part of that definition is that ham has to contain meat.

[–] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I find it helpful to have the thing being imitated as part of the name, but not the full name. It makes for an easy way to know what the taste and texture should be and how it can be used in cooking. My kid developed a dairy allergy recently and vegan butter in particular is so easy to substitute in old favorite recipes without changing the flavor much or cooking method. As for meat imitations, a “vegetarian steak” (or ham) label conveys a lot about the texture, moisture, saltiness, and cooking techniques you can expect to use while a generic name such as “plant protein block” leaves you much more clueless as to what the texture and cooking method is meant to be for that item. I don’t think it should be legal to sell plant substitutes as only “steak “ or “butter”, but calling it “plant steak” or “plant butter” is way more straightforward and easy to fit on a label than a lengthy description of “plant patty with a fibrous, chewy texture and savory flavor resembling steak.”

[–] occhineri@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

A milk is what I mix with my cereal, pour in my coffee, use in a pancake mixture and so on. I can't see any logic behind limiting this to animal products other than a political agenda.

[–] trollercoaster@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And that does make sense - butter has to be made from milk

cries in coal butter

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

It actually is allowed for German "Scheuermilch" ("scouring cream", which is a cleaning detergent, literal translation: "scrubbing milk").

[–] voodoocode@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And we had this minister for transport Scheuer...

[–] trollercoaster@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

But his name doesn't come from Scheuermilch, it's rather an abbreviation of "bescheuert" - bonkers.

[–] ian@feddit.uk 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh hell. I've been drinking Scheuermilch! I thought it was a bit crunchy

[–] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

At least, your teeth or what's left of them is pretty white.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

The law only addresses agricultural products but yeah there are exceptions for products that were traditional before the law was passed

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2010/791/oj

[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except for coconut milk, because reasons.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

Yea there are some exceptions for traditional products https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2010/791/oj

[–] skele_tron@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Germany has a whole line of not milks, almost chicken, like chicken, thun visch and i can almost be certain i saw mjolk and moloko somehwere. I always chuckle a bit when i see it.

[–] anzich@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

Smells a little fishy, I assume