this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32285 readers
594 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dill@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How does this compare to other countries?

Edit: piss poor googling lead me to 17% of flights in USA being private.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Private != Jet though, a 172, while still not the most efficient method of travel is much different than a leerjet.

[–] ultimitchow@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For anyone wondering, a 172 can hold 3 adults including the pilot, cruises at 115mph, and burns about 9 gallons of fuel per hour so it gets 12.8 miles per gallon. A Learjet 45 can hold 11 people, cruises at 510mph, and burns about 200 gallons per hour so it gets 2.2 mpg. A Boeing 787-9 can hold 290 people, cruises at 560mph, burns 2000 gph, and gets 0.28mpg.

The 172 uses 2.63 gallons per person to go 100mi, the Learjet uses 4.06 gallons, and the 787 uses 1.23.

A 2022 Toyota Corolla gets around 40mpg highway and squeezes 5 people inside so it uses 0.5 gallons per person per 100mi.

[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

A 2022 Toyota Corolla gets around 40mpg highway and squeezes 5 people inside so it uses 0.5 gallons per person per 100mi.

5 people in the Corolla is 2–3 times as many people as are at all likely to be in there. That's a very skewed number.

When using realistic numbers, cars come in at about the same per mile as large commercial airliners. (Flights tend to be far, far longer of course.)