under the lens of feminism

And again, just for my amusement since - you can't read, same rules apply to men, women and different religion.

to infantilizing who disagrees with you.

Nah, mate - you have done it to yourself, but just not engaging with what I write and making weird absolutist statement. Obviously I don't know if you are a teen, but I sure hope so.

but that doesn’t mean that forcing someone NOT to do something in the name of laicism isn’t any less oppressive.

So how do you make sure that girls that don't want to wear religious closing are not forced to to so? Sometimes you have to chose, whose rights to oppress - and sorry I will be always on the side of moderates and not fundamentalist. Since as mentioned before - there is no point in appeasement of fundamentalist.

you are running on the assumption that the law must be just because it oppresses everyone equally.

No, I was more like: you don't like secular countries - move to a religious one. Because we have a lot of the second and only a few of the first. But again - you can't read so you will never know.

Anyway, I hate internet screaming contests,

Sure buddy.

Enjoy your neoliberal state slipping into authoritarianism.

Sure, gay Europe is in it's downfall and will end surly soon, just after capitalism collapses. I know that argument from somewhere - and not from feminists.