this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
110 points (99.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2814 readers
1079 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're not participating in protests to protect her.

This is 100% the correct choice. I know it’s hard to hang back when this affects you both so seriously, but it’s more important to protect yourselves right now.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Eh, I'm not sure I'd call it so unambiguously correct. Is it understandable, certainly, but this is fear he wants us to have so that people don't fight back. This is what the part about complying in advance is all about. Things won't get better if everyone or most people cower before he acts

He wants people to not act so that he can bulldoze through. We need people to be brave and to stand up against fear. Fear is contagious - just as courage is

This is classic Prisoner's Dilemma. The best outcome is for everybody to rise up together in protest, but the individual incentive is to keep one's head down. Neither choice is unambiguously correct, which is what makes game theory so interesting.