News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
With out reading any details the words Epstein and suicide in the same sentence make me believe this is a lie.
She was recently beaten so badly by her husband that her life was in danger, and then she was hit by a schoolbus. Things can't have been going well for her.
https://people.com/virginia-giuffre-leaves-hospital-after-crash-saved-life-11710158
Damn, I hadn't heard about her husband being abusive. It's striking to me that Giuffre was 41 when she died, and had been married to her husband for 22 years, meaning she was around 19 when they married. That's very young, and so soon after being sex trafficked by Maxwell and Epstein.
It's unclear how far back the abuse by her husband stretched back, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was present to some degree for their entire relationship. And surviving abuse at the hands of Epstein and co may well have made her more vulnerable. Fucking hell.
That's terribly sad to hear.
Didn't she publication state recently that she was terminally ill as well? Something like liver failure. Maybe she chose to go on her terms in the end.
Kidney failure as a consequence of the school bus crash.
It's almost as if the details were right there a single finger tap or click away.
Or at least as a starting point for your own research.
Ahh yes an NBC news article. Forgive me if I don't take their word as gospel. They called Jeffrey Epsteins death an apparent suicide too.
You're absolutely right. The NBC article is gash.
I'm not sure what your comment is trying to prove though?
If you were engaged enough to comment your theory on the article, then surely you were engaged enough to read the article; see in the first couple of paragraphs that the news was the result of a family statement; search for that statement; find a People article with further details on the death (which admittedly problematic as it's an exclusive article, meaning options for corroboration are few); but noting that the claim initially came from a family member along with a brother that was staying with her - two people who I'm making an assumption are the most likely to challenge any kind of coverup?
I just don't understand the logic of throwing a theory out there and proudly claiming that you haven't read the article? I do understand that I came across as a cunt in that initial reply and I apologise to you directly, but I'm interested in dissenting opinion as always.
To be clear, I'm not saying you're 100% wrong - I'm saying there's very little in the way of currently available facts to support your assertion.
What was my comment trying to prove? Nothing really. I just said the first thing that popped into my head when I saw that headline.
All I can say is thank goodness you took the time to comment.