this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
602 points (98.9% liked)

Political Memes

7955 readers
2780 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't matter if they still let him go even though he doesn't respect the dress code.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How does a 34-count felon pass through the countries?

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The same way sewage usually passes though countries I would imagine.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Many nations do not allow convicted felons to visit. Italy is not one of them.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure all of them will have forms that can be filled to allow access to felons with approval of the border services, it's the case in Canada and is the process that Bush had to go through to visit and that Trump will have to go through to visit as well. He will be let in, but the paperwork will have to be filled.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

He counts that as a win. MF lives for shit like this. Look up all the petty shit he did when he bought Mar-a-lago.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What's with the dude wearing the white bowtie?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

Looks like he's also wearing a tailcoat. That's maximum formality. I assume as an indication of maximum respect. Probably not planning to tapdance.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

White tie is a level of formality above black tie. He might probably a diplomat honoring him as head of state rather than as the head of Catholic Church.

A Secret Server.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Is a dark blue suit not a "dark suit?" Trump isn't even the only person wearing a dark blue suit in this picture:

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I fucking hate formalwear rules.

Dark blue should count as a "dark suit", shouldn't it? If the expectation was "wear a black suit", then the rule should have been "wear a black suit".

Even just having to wear a suit at all is stupid: "You must wear a special kind of jacket that doesn't properly close in front, creating a little window through which people can see the shirt you're wearing underneath, and a ribbon of pretty fabric you wear draped around your neck."

Meanwhile, women are allowed to just use reasonable discretion as long as they're wearing a dress. The style of dress isn't specified (but of course most women will interpret it as "show a little bit of bare chest, but not too much, because it's a funeral")

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All the women pictured here are wearing black in the strictest sense of the color what in the fuck are you even rambling about

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I wonder if future people will see the suit and tie and think about it similarly to how we look at paintings of people from the 17th century wearing Ruffs, and concluding that they looked silly. I sure do think ties look silly.

Ties are especially ironic because they derived from a time when buttons - made by necessity out of rare items like ivory or whale bone - were expensive as fuck and it was cheaper to close up your neck with a strip of scrap fabric. Most people today can afford plastic buttons.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Suit/tie combo has been the focul point of men's fashion longer than any other style(in western culture at least). It's remained more or less the same for over 100 years

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course it will be seen as silly. Most people are just too used to them to see them that way today.

It's like seeing judges wearing wigs and robes. At one point that was just normal formalwear, but it looks really goofy now.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think suit/tie and dresses are the only type of clothing every human will recognize for as long as civilization as we know it doesn't crumble. You could show someone from ~~100~~300 years ago, a suit or a dress from today, and they would know what it was

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The suit is a 20th century invention.

Someone might "know what it was", i.e. it's a jacket that doesn't close properly and matching pants. But, they didn't exist until the 20th century.

It's a matter of time before they finally go out of fashion, and people look at them like we look at men wearing tights and shirts with puffy sleeves.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Nah. It was invented in the 17th century.

Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours?

18th century suits

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Not that far off

"Clothes-Optional" funerals are a blast when everyone is 73.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree if the expectation was for people to wear black only, then the text of the code should have said "black" and not "dark."

Formal Dress Codes suck, but at the least the events are usually short and you can at least take off the tie and jacket, maybe roll up the shirt sleeves if they're long.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Where do you draw the line between black and grey? Dark should mean black or dark grey. Although the reality is that nothing is truly black, one of the closest we've seen is Vanta Black.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Cartoonist Michael Leunig (r.i.p.) called them the 'business burkha' and I've thought of them as such ever since.