this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
419 points (94.9% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2675 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United Nation’s top court filed a ruling Friday that echoed what Palestinian advocates have been saying for decades: Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land, including its settlements in the West Bank, is illegal and must end.

The International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion also called for reparations for Palestinians who have lived under Israel’s occupation since it began in 1967, an unprecedented step for the court.

The court also notably declared Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinians to be a form of segregation and apartheid. It further ruled that nations cannot offer aid in support of the illegal occupation without violating international law, and upheld the Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the advantage of having a supranational organization is that everybody is looking at it and its reputation relies on how good it is. the disadvantage is that they have no power other than advisory

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are other terrible international organizations, though. Like the IOC or FIFA.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

fifa is weird, it is a private company kinda but not really. And they have all rights to the word football (?)

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

FIFA is absolutely private. They're an association. Which is also the case for their members, which are national football associations, and that's generally also the case for the members of those, which are the clubs. Long story short the reason FIFA sucks is because its members don't properly reign it in. Part of the issue is that it's not just handling the world cup, it's also handling erm development aid, lots of money flowing to poorer regions so that they can buy cleats to develop more players which is all well and proper trouble is it invites corruption.

OTOH they're not actually as powerful as it seems, in the end the Brits are severely over-represented when it comes to laying down the laws of the game.

The IOC is also an association, also under Swiss law, but a quite different beast: They're basically a gentleman's club travelling around the world making deals. It's not like the world association of track and field or whatnot (which do exist for pretty much any sport) are members of it.