this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
311 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

9615 readers
877 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Honestly, it doesn't matter if it's possible or not. The very fact that key replacement parts of the jet can only be built in the US means that the very moment they chose not to sell those parts to Canada, the F35 is on a strict time limit before becoming the world's most expensive paperweight.

And that time limit isn't even very long. Maybe two years of normal use outside of a war, as little as a month or two during a war or any sort of foreign deployment.

We're kinda locked in for the first few planes, but despite cancellation fees, we need to replace our aging fleet with something from someone that won't throw a tantrum and erase a key component of our national defense with the swipe of a pen.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

During the 1960s, the Australian Army bought the Swedish 84mm Carl Gustaf rocket launchers. It was believed perfect for bunker busting. However, Sweden refused to sell us the necessary munitions because we wanted them for the Vietnam War.

If you don't own the supply chain, you don't own the weapon system.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's actually pretty badass of Sweden...

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not arguing that it wasn't. Perhaps we shouldn't have bought shit we couldn't use?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did it seem as though I was trying to argue with you?

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, you took a rhetorical statement literally.

I was conceding your point.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

I mean, having a few of the plane is going to be handy... it's rare that your enemies will sell you their equipment to dissect, normally you have to capture it

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

and it has ultra poor flight time such that maintenance, and part replacements, are ultra frequent. Wouldn't surprise me if 3 flights is a maximum without Lockheed consultant required word.