this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
177 points (88.3% liked)

Linux

47331 readers
921 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s become clear to many that Red Hat’s recent missteps with CentOS and the availability of RHEL source code indicate that it’s fallen from its respected place as “the open organization.” SUSE seems to be poised to benefit from Red Hat’s errors. We connect the dots.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Linux is that it is today thanks to Redhat.

Mmm, maybe - but only if you allow that the same can be said for the tens of thousands of other companies and individuals who have contributed.

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Absolutely it can.

But Redhat is a huge contributor

The biggest threat that Linux faces isn't from Microsoft or other companies. Over the past 30 years, I've noticed it is actually from the community. I've seen so many cases where the community blows things out of proportion and scares off developers. It sucks. Linux and open source would be so much more successful if we didn't constantly make open source toxic for companies

Poor people like Lennart Poettering get shat on constantly too. He could get a much better paying job

Even right now.. VSCode. It's open source and MIT. People are STILL crapping on Microsoft and saying stuff like "oh wait for the enshittification", instead of thanking them, or encouraging them for more

It's bonkers.. There's so much negative reinforcement out there that it's scaring people away

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

You are right.

It's human nature emboldened by freedom, of course. Codes of Practice help, but can't change the freedom that comes from entitlement and anonymity.

But on balance, there's an awful lot of genuine people doing good, respectfully and politely.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What other company or individual can the same be said of?

He did not say “shared a two-line bug fix one time”. The claim is that Red Hat is almost uniquely important in the Open Source ecosystem. Their source code contributions and / or the number of significant project that they have founded are evidence of this.

Can you name even a single company with the same impact? You certainly cannot name tens of thousands.

Often, when somebody moves the goal posts to avoid addressing an argument head on, it is to intentionally mislead. I hope that is not the case here.