Artist Lounge

25 readers

1 users here now

Rules:

you know the rules

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

hilliard@lemmy.world

Paul Gauguin may not have been a syphilitic perv after all.... (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by quinacridone@lemmy.ml to c/artistlounge@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An interesting article in today's Guardian on a new book that re examines his rather dubious reputation....

....driven by all the new material that began appearing in 2019, which coincided with the reopening of the debate about Gauguin’s troubling reputation. It seemed important to re-examine his life: not to condemn, not to excuse, but simply to shed new light on the man and the myth.

edit- fixed link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] quinacridone@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That would be an interesting revision for the (art) history books if it was actually manslaughter/murder rather than suicide, I found this article with a quick search Vanity Fair

No one knew where he would have gotten a gun; no one admitted to finding the gun afterward, or any of the other items he had taken with him (canvas, easel, paints, etc.). His deathbed doctors, an obstetrician and a homeopathist, could make no sense of his wounds.

I'm finding these reexaminations, not just of art and artists, but also black history/colonialism, sexual politics etc really interesting

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith offered a far more plausible scenario—that Van Gogh was killed—only to find themselves under attack

Geez, that's become so modern and depressing.

Monied interests, and all that, I don't know...