I used the number the previous commentator used. I've now converted the 32 fl.oz (I figure it's US fl.oz.) to Liter, which is 0.96l so I guess the actual content would be something like 28g/100ml which is not that far off my previous statement of 26g/100ml.

Which to clarify is something like 20% sugar content when taking the average density of water and substracting a bit to make up for the higher density of a milk shake.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Oh I totally missed that. Thanks for clarifying!

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

With the amount of fat in it I'd think the density would be lower than water

[–] RidderSport 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe I should have looked that up forst, I kind of figured that since the viscosity of the drink would be lower the density would be higher