this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
537 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4021 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moody@lemmings.world 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

He didn't shoot Trump, he shot towards him.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He hit his ear, so technically he shot Trump.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol:

Crooks tried out for his school’s rifle team but failed to make it because he was a “comically bad shot” and made jokes deemed inappropriate with firearms around, two former classmates told The New York Post.

He missed his target by close to 20ft, Jameson Murphy said.

“He tried out…and was such a comically bad shot he was unable to make the team and left after the first day,” he added.

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I understand the injury to his ear was from shrapnel.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't know why you're being downvoted. I thought that the current theory was that his ear was cut by a glass shard from a teleprompter.

Has that been disproven?

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even Newsmax was reporting that.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Newsmax is the only place actually reporting on it. All other articles I see talking about it use Newsmax as a source.

Axios briefly offered validation on this theory, and then retracted.

So I guess if you believe this, you would have to first consider Newsmax to be a credible source...

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Newsmax would usually present their messiah in the best possible light.

load more comments (5 replies)