this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
154 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59599 readers
3178 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 79 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This happens when a MBA CEO ran an engineering company. Where did we hear that before?.. Something something Boeing.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Tim Apple is an MBA. Is the company struggling?

[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He is a supply chain guy. He did a tremendous job on making sure you need for every single thing on an apple device either an adapter or a repair that cost more than the device itself. Since Tim took over, the only noticable succeful disruption from a technological perspective is Apples M silicon. The rest is old wine in new bottles. For the rest its upselling and people that are crazy enough to put 1200 dollar/euro down for a phone or an 8gbyte RAM Mac. And to be straight, I have no problems with that. But there might be a time where Apple ends up in that same corner.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They did an attempt at VR, just because it didn't sell doesn't mean they didn't make technically the most capable VR set

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

At that price, they weren't going to sell much. What jackass thought people other than the most rabid fanbois was going to spend $3500 on a beta version of tech that hasn't got a killer app yet?

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

It's easy to make the most capable product if you disregard the price point completely.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They did an attempt at VR

but it was a me-too attempt, almost a copycat of existing hardware... hardly innovative

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it kinda sounds similar... what's the last innovative product from Apple?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Apple was never really that innovative. Their business model was to take recent innovations, like handheld computers, package them up all nice and shiny, and market the hell out of them. That's what sold the iPod, even though there have been plenty more technically superior devices. Same with all their other products.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You’re not wrong. I’d argue the iPhone was quite innovative. I laughed when I heard Apple was gonna take on Nokia. Nokia was a juggernaut at the time. Apple presented Nokia’s proverbial head two years later. Quite the turnover. Apple is still living off iPhone profits 15+ years later.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're living off the rent from older products. What's their last innovation? Vision Pro??

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it wasn't a success, but at least they are trying. What's the last Google innovation?

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What does Google have to do with that?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Why are we expecting Apple to be innovative in particular? None of the big companies are doing that