this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
291 points (98.3% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2708 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Of course but there is always the risk that Russia gets mad enough that it fires missiles at Poland.

Logic like that doesn't really work on an international scale with missiles. It's not like it's guaranteed that Russia will react with "Damnit, they are technically correct so I guess we will do nothing"

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmings.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Russia gets mad enough that it fires missiles at Poland.

Poland is a NATO member. If they attacked Poland, it's game over for Russia. NATO, mostly the US really, would curbstomp them so hard.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe.

NATO obviously doesn't want to get involved so it's quite likely they will do jack shit if just a couple of missiles hit Poland.

People here always have such a weird superiority complex when it comes to NATO. Yes NATO would likely win in the end but LOTS of people would die in the process.

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

If a NATO member is attacked the other members are treaty bound to come to its defense.

And there's no superiority complex about it. Russia's military is a joke compared to the US military. The US Air Force and Navy could flatten Russia without having a single boot on the ground if the US was forced into a confrontation with it.

[–] mea_rah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The risk is there no mater what Poland does. Russian missiles already fell on Polish land. If russia could do more they'd already do that.

Poland can just declare that they are protecting from stray missiles before they enter their airspace. What are russians going to do? Fire missiles at NATO country? At the very least, they'd just get massive wall of AA along the Polish border shooting down missiles even deeper in Ukraine.

Remember that russia already claimed that there is NATO crew manning the AA systems in Ukraine. Following their propaganda, this would actually be deescalation.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but there are obviously reasons for not doing it. Otherwise they would already be doing that.

[–] mea_rah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I'd say that big concern is AA missiles falling on Ukraine. It opens a can of worms where technically Polish-operated missile might kill citizens of Ukraine. Nothing is 100% failsafe. They probably need to flash out all possible eventualities and it's not risk-free politically, so it requires someone motivated enough to push the thing through.