this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
191 points (87.5% liked)
Showerthoughts
29580 readers
1405 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- Posts must be original/unique
- Be good to others - no bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I personally think cars should have two brake light switches. one for when you're pressing the pedal at all, and one for when you're slamming on the pedal.
that way the people behind you know if you're just slowing down a little or actually braking.
Actually, a least some cars (probably more than you think)/have some sort of "emergency" breaking signal, which often result in the usual breaking signal blinking for a while. You need to seriously slam the brakes to see it though. E.g: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j_osu1WgGMU
There is also a nice technology connection video talking about braking lights for electric cars and in general, which can be dangerous.
I rented an electric car recently (Mach-E) and almost exclusively drove in single-pedal mode.
Thought a lot about this video as I was driving.
I've seen some people play with the programming of BMWs. I was really impressed with one I saw that had 3 levels of lighting. It didn't affect the actual brake lights but instead utilized the rear fog light. Normal braking was just the normal lights. Moderate braking turned on the rear fog lights. But when he slammed the brakes, the rear fogs flashed.
I was also pissed to be in traffic that allowed for all 3 modes in a few miles.
if you have an adequate following distance you never need to brake hard
That's frequently not the choice of the driver. An adequate follow distance provides a luxurious amount of space for someone to merge into, forcing you to slow to extend the follow distance, which allows more people to merge... etc.
nope
... What?
There is no situation when one is obligated to tailgate
I'm not sure you read what I wrote.
I am sure of it
Then... what? You're coming back days later to "no u" a comment that lays out pretty explicitly an exception to what you're presenting as a blanket rule. Do you... disagree? Are you just inexperienced enough with driving to not have had that happen to you? Adjusting to driving conditions takes time - even if it's only for 6-7 seconds per incident, that's still time where you're forced to follow far too close to another car without an ability to prevent the situation from arising. You seem like you don't understand that, sometimes, other people can be responsible for the situations you are put in through no fault of your own. Or, you're a sith. A driving sith.
...
Darth Subaru.
From my point of view the Jedi are evil