this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
191 points (87.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

29805 readers
703 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scafir@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Actually, a least some cars (probably more than you think)/have some sort of "emergency" breaking signal, which often result in the usual breaking signal blinking for a while. You need to seriously slam the brakes to see it though. E.g: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j_osu1WgGMU

There is also a nice technology connection video talking about braking lights for electric cars and in general, which can be dangerous.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago

I rented an electric car recently (Mach-E) and almost exclusively drove in single-pedal mode.

Thought a lot about this video as I was driving.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've seen some people play with the programming of BMWs. I was really impressed with one I saw that had 3 levels of lighting. It didn't affect the actual brake lights but instead utilized the rear fog light. Normal braking was just the normal lights. Moderate braking turned on the rear fog lights. But when he slammed the brakes, the rear fogs flashed.

I was also pissed to be in traffic that allowed for all 3 modes in a few miles.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

if you have an adequate following distance you never need to brake hard

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That's frequently not the choice of the driver. An adequate follow distance provides a luxurious amount of space for someone to merge into, forcing you to slow to extend the follow distance, which allows more people to merge... etc.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There is no situation when one is obligated to tailgate

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you read what I wrote.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Then... what? You're coming back days later to "no u" a comment that lays out pretty explicitly an exception to what you're presenting as a blanket rule. Do you... disagree? Are you just inexperienced enough with driving to not have had that happen to you? Adjusting to driving conditions takes time - even if it's only for 6-7 seconds per incident, that's still time where you're forced to follow far too close to another car without an ability to prevent the situation from arising. You seem like you don't understand that, sometimes, other people can be responsible for the situations you are put in through no fault of your own. Or, you're a sith. A driving sith.

...

Darth Subaru.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

From my point of view the Jedi are evil