If they can elect a felon to the white house, so could we.
Edit: Better image, thanks to @PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
1498 points (97.3% liked)
Political Memes
7946 readers
2408 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Trump has everything to do with the fact that there is not going to be any chance to do any sort of progressive reforms in America again in the foreseeable future. Just like there are not going to be any elections again in the foreseeable future.
You still think things are fixable in the U.S.
You are in for a rude awakening.
Please quote me endorsing a single right-wing policy. My entire comment history is open to you.
(Weird as fuck to call me right wing when I've been calling Trump a fascist dictator. Do you think that's an endorsement or something?)
If by "support" I told everyone to vote for them once the primaries were over because the only viable alternative would be a fascist dictatorship that would be the end of America and the start of at least two genocides.
And now look at where we're heading. And Harris lost, meaning this should be what you want, so I don't know why you're calling me right-wing when you wanted the fascist dictator to win.
Again, Harris lost, which is what you wanted. The right-winger won. That was the only other option, so it must have been what you wanted.
So I have no idea why you're calling me right-wing. Or why you're defending Trump.
Again, there were two viable options- Trump or Harris. You made it clear just now that Harris should have lost. That means you wanted Trump to win.
And now you're defending him by saying he won't be a dictator even though he literally says he'll be a dictator and that he won't be committing genocides even though he has made his genocidal plans very clear and he's being aided in them right now.
So, again, you got what you wanted and you're defending your choice. So I have no idea why you're calling me right-wing.
Now I voted for Trump? I thought I supported Biden and Harris. Make up your mind.
So let me get this straight... Harris wanted genocide and mass deportation, but Trump doesn't want either of those things.
This you?
How do you think either Harris or Trump would achieve mass deportations and genocide without dictatorial powers?
Please explain the legal mechanism.
This should be good.
If it did, you can explain the legal mechanism for mass deportations and genocide without dictatorial powers.
Please do so.
Sorry, local cops cannot have a legal requirement to do that. That would only be possible in a dictatorship.
I'm starting to think you're not in the U.S. based on the things you're saying.