this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
484 points (100.0% liked)

196

16423 readers
1970 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is that like how child like manga cartoon girls are fictional and not just pedo fantasy bs?

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a furry or into loli stuff but I think there's a big difference. Furries do closely resemble adult human bodies in every way, however lolis resemble human children.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course you think there's a different, you're into sexy animals, not sexy children.

You don't see how they're the same. They are the same type of thing. Sorry kiddo. Hate to break it to you.

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Lol did you even read my comment? I'm into neither furries or loli. Perhaps you have a hard time reading from up there on your high horse.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The only difference between pantie shots of underage girls in anime and those in real life is the fact that one is on a screen. People who get off specifically to the fact that these characters are underage have no excuse for doing so besides being into children in real life. It is specifically their youth and by extension their lack of ability to give meaningful consent (because they treat anyone older than them as an authority figure) which, to a certain class of degenerate, makes them attractive.

If a real-life man who was short and had a childlike face was in a bar complaining about how his wife left him, and someone else in that bar thought he was hot, no one would begrudge them for it, because he's an adult. So it is with furries. We see that animals are not intelligent and cannot give consent and ask ourselves "what if they were intelligent? what if they looked human? what if they stopped being animals in any meaningful way besides having fur?"

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

🙄 everyone sees you as loving beastiality. It doesn't matter how much you defend it as fictional. Porn is fictional too. Furries are engaging with it and making it thier personality. It's beastiality in the eyes of everyone that sees you. That's it.

You can go on and on about it as much as you'd like. All I'm seeing is bullshit excuses, same as everyone else sees it.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Everyone, huh? Check the vote counters on any of the comments in this thread.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Furries up voting doesn't mean a thing.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Multiple people have replied to you defending me and led by saying they weren't furries. Why can't you just admit you're the only one who thinks they're disgusting?

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, my bad. Multiple people that are a into sexualizing animals have defended you. It must be ok then!

Fuck off

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry I can't hear you over the sound of everyone else in this entire community telling me I'm beautiful and perfect 💜