this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
94 points (90.5% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2275 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.earth 4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Yes, but they didn't need to do that before, now they aren't so certain.

Before Bashar's indefinite vacation they just flew by and bombed whatever they though needed bombing and Bashar would just bank the right to respond, instead of actually responding or using the air defenses to stop the bombing in the first place.

They never needed to bomb Syria since Bashar took care of that. Plus his barrels had shrapnel and metal nails to cause as much bodily harm as possible to "his people".

If they needed to get someone out of Syria and into some interrogation room they would just cross the border and grab him out of his house, just load him up and drive away.

I don't think there are many things done to Gaza today that Bashar didn't do to Douma, Daria, Allepo, Dar'a, Hama, Idlib, Homs, and Raqaa 10+ years ago.

Now Syria has some stability, the de facto government isn't driving a wedge between each Syrian and their neighbor based on religion and race to keep Syrians in fear of each other, and they are actually working to improve peoples' lives.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Before Israel could not do that. It is not like they did not want to. Greater Israel has always included Syria.

[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If they wanted to, they could've destroyed all the weapons, defenses, and bases while Bashar was destroying infrastructure and homes. As for a land invasion, lets not pretend that HTS' take over was more than them marching forward and replacing flags. No one would have fought for Bashar if Israel with air support and advanced weaponry were to start an invasion.

Israel bombed Gaza and went in, then did the same for Lebanon, and was inevitably gonna enter Syria. It just wasn't in a rush to do so, the regime had already turned the country into rubble for them and was massacring Syrians city by city. It wouldn't have been in Israel's best interest to leave their regime exposed with no air defense or artillery.

Just for the record I don't believe that HTS or the next Syrian government will keep up this feud with Israel, they're an actual government that's trying to build a country. It has been clear for quite some time now that the regime is not interested in the "Axis of resistance" and whatever they were planing, but they really needed the Russian and Iranian support so they stayed as a part of the resistance on paper. Now it's gonna be official: No one is coming to get the Golan heights back, and no one has the power to help the Palestinians.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Assad would have fought back against his military getting destroyed. HTS is not doing anything.

Assad did not directly attack Israel. He was transporting weapons for Iran to Hezbollah.

For now we shall see. It is possible HTS will resist Israel but looking less and less likely.

[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why didn't he fight back against HTS? They didn't destroy his military, they ousted him from Syria. Terrorists now control Syria, the people are happy, the economy is improving, and people feel safe in their homes. How did he let that happen?

Assad did not directly attack Israel. He was transporting weapons for Iran to Hezbollah.

He wasn't transporting weapons to Hezbollah, he was just standing there and the weapons were being transported. Until Israel threatened him and the dumbass Maher who thought he was being sneaky.

For now we shall see. It is possible HTS will resist Israel but looking less and less likely.

HTS will fight to sign a peace agreement acknowledging that the Golan is part of Israel at the very least.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Haha. Golan belongs to Israel, and then Israel needs a new "buffer zone". This is what I mean by HTS cope.

Syria got bombed quite a few times by Israel during the Hezbollah attacks. Assad was not only transporting weapons he was stashing them in bases and actively working with Iran.

I am glad Assad is gone for the people of Syria, but HTS is giving Israel everything it wants and sooner or later Syria will be colonized by Israel.

Assads replacement will not be Golani but Netanyahu.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)