this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
561 points (99.6% liked)

Stick Enthusiasts

1087 readers
616 users here now

A place for enthusiasts of sticks of all shapes and sizes. We all love a good stick! Is it a walking stick? Light Saber? Gun? Looks brown and sticky? You decide!

Feel free to post sticks to rate, sticks that look like things, memes about sticks, long winded rants about the superiority of birch sticks over oak, anything stick related! Natural sticks are preferred, but modification and ornamentation is also fine.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
561
Well, does it? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by kersploosh@sh.itjust.works to c/stick@sh.itjust.works
 

Found this post on IG and I'm wondering what this community's stance is. With winter now officially here*, I think it's a valid question.

Edit: *where I live

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Podunk@lemmy.world 59 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

I just realized there is an entire continent where there are no trees, and thus no sticks.

And it isnt a small continent either. it is larger than all of Europe and also larger than Australia. We arent talking about an island or archipelago or even some random landlocked desert. It is a continent.

the fact that there are no sticks that naturally occur there at all... it confuses and concerns me.

This is deeply unsettling to me.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry, flowers are starting to bloom more and more on Antarctica.

Soon, trees will start to grow so even that continent has sticks!

Wait ... that is even a bigger concern to worry.

[–] __nobodynowhere@startrek.website 1 points 43 minutes ago

When humanity has to move to the poles to survive, I'd rather have trees and not.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Before it slipped down to the bottom of the world, it used to be covered in jungles.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 4 points 5 hours ago

It makes sense why there are no sticks. But I agree, the thought of a lack of sticks seems to be unsettling, not a lack of trees or bushes.

Are we that naturally attracted to sticks because of primate evolution? I wonder if the earliest human ancestors developed this awareness of sticks as it is a primitive tool used to survive.

[–] VolumetricShitCompressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 54 minutes ago

So what did doggos do to make their hell freeze over?

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

also larger than Australia

Not all that well-known, but Australia claims about 42% of Antarctica as part of it's territory.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 53 minutes ago

Maybe but usually when people talk about Australia in this context they mean the continent, not the country.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

Claims vs. recognized.

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't worry. At this rate, the ice will be gone soon and... oh

[–] Podunk@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So i did a little research. The sad/fun part about my realization is... if you go back far enough in time, before the ice and nothingness, archeologists have pointed out that Antarctica was once a massive forest continent.

Millions of years ago, it had trees, and thus, sticks for days and days.

Once again we are living in the wrong time. Too late to explore all continents having sticks. But also too early to live where all continents have sticks. In the grand scheme of things, we exist in the uneven ground.

It's a sad equilibrium to be sure.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

There's also stuff we're pretty sure first evolved there. Because it used to connect south America to Australia