this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
680 points (98.9% liked)

Shirts That Go Hard

3682 readers
201 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2

Community Rules

No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content

Also, follow the Terms of Service/rules of Lemmy.World.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

there’s something hauntingly poetic about the ebb and flows of human compassion coming together to form language that allows the marginalized to express their need for emancipation, only for the inevitable surge of encultured ableism to quell that spark and steal that language for its own purpose. over and over and over. what will break the cycle? will people with disabilities ever get to have a concrete hold on the words they use to describe themselves, or is this a permanent fixture in the world we are forcing onto the disabled?

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I read this in a Werner Hertzog voice

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 10 hours ago

idk if thats good or bad but ty for sharing 😅

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In the latest Diagnostic and Statistics Manual (DSM-5-TR), intellectual disability is the term that replaces mental retardation meaning mentally slow or delayed. Before mental retardation, it was mental deficiency implying there was something inferior. To me, there's no real difference between mental deficiency and intellectual disability. They are synonymous. Before the first DSM, a prominent doctor in the field of intelligence created a tiered system of intelligence that applied the labels moron, imbecile, and idiot (ordered higher to lower intelligence). Those words became derogatory too. The issue is not that scientists can't guess the correct term that wont become an insult.

The issue is that society defines values for people which allows terms to be insults. As long as oppression exists, the vulnerable will fall victim to it. The disabled, by definition, will always be part of the vulnerable group. Additionally, oppression is always justified by arguments on who deserves what, whether it be religion, race, sex, social class, work ethic, or intelligence. As long as we hold the value that inequitable distribution is not only acceptable but the ultimate goal of a just society, then regardless of the rules we establish, however noble or virtuous, the disabled will always be part of the oppressed, and thus, the terms for lower intelligence will continually evolve from neutral to derogatory.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 9 points 1 day ago

As long as we hold the value that inequitable distribution is not only acceptable but the ultimate goal of a just society, then regardless of the rules we establish, however noble or virtuous, the disabled will always be part of the oppressed, and thus, the terms for lower intelligence will continually evolve from neutral to derogatory.

Preach! 🗣️🗣️🔥

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The deaf seem to own it. They made up their own language and ableism can't do shit.

But that is the only exception I can think of. (And they are really independent).

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

excellent point! i hope for a future where the same patterns can work for the good of all disabled identities

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mostly because we don't give a shit what the hearing say about us

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

We were commenting on your nice shoulders but that's fine 😭