this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
608 points (92.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1867 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I love how people are blaming McDonald's—and boycotting them—for the actions of a single employee. How does that make any sense?

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

If McDonald’s pays their employees a decent wage the employee might not have been compelled to call the pigs.

I think it's great. Everyone with a reason to live longer should boycott McDonald's.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

McDonalds could have made a public statement. They didn't

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They don't endorse the snitching

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Riiight. 'Cause that's something any corporation would say, ever.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, I guess boycott every corporation. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Like, not even your favorite non-profit would say that. You're literally expecting the impossible.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess. Not really.

“Peak Design has not provided customer information to the police and would only do so under the order of a subpoena"

That's not the same as saying "We are against our employees calling the police when they see a suspect in our store." after an employee does that. That's what I'm talking about.

On the other hand, very few corporations would volunteer data without a court order. That's normal. We're not talking about that. We're talking about coming out and saying, "We don't support our employees calling the police on a suspect." That's something very few—or no—corporations would do.

It's two very different statements and situations.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, not really but somewhat. Anyway I actually enjoyed our debate, it seems we reached the point where we both understand what the other meant. I just come from bluesky where assholes quote post you to death instead of giving arguments to win the debate. Lemmy feels so much better, away from swarms of fans ready to defend their idols

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

You expected a rational reason for irrational behaviour? It's never going to make sense outside of "it's just virtue signaling."

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

gestures to Tesla/Musk

'it's just the actions of one employee'

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you count the owner as an "employee" or is he by definition the "employer?"

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I dunno, but he definitely doesn't do any work